NOBOX vs. WFBIX
NOBOX (Northern Bond Index Fund) and WFBIX (iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, NOBOX returned 1.11%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for WFBIX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NOBOX charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for WFBIX.
Performance
NOBOX vs. WFBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOBOX achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly lower than WFBIX's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBOX has underperformed WFBIX with an annualized return of 1.11%, while WFBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.94% annualized return.
NOBOX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 3.23%
- 5Y*
- -0.70%
- 10Y*
- 1.11%
WFBIX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 5.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.87%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
NOBOX vs. WFBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBOX Northern Bond Index Fund | -0.17% | 6.14% | 0.82% | 4.86% | -13.84% | -2.10% | 7.20% | 8.73% | -0.17% | 3.60% |
WFBIX iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund | 0.21% | 7.16% | 1.43% | 9.65% | -13.03% | -1.79% | 7.40% | 8.72% | -0.08% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOBOX and WFBIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007 | 0.93 |
The correlation between NOBOX and WFBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOBOX vs. WFBIX — Risk / Return Rank
NOBOX
WFBIX
NOBOX vs. WFBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOBOX | WFBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.70 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.47 | 5.08 | -0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOBOX | WFBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.30 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.14 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.38 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.94 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
NOBOX vs. WFBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOBOX drawdown since its inception was -20.03%, which is greater than WFBIX's maximum drawdown of -18.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBOX and WFBIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOBOX | WFBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.03% | -18.68% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.28% | -3.02% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.27% | -6.09% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.15% | -17.84% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.03% | -18.68% | -1.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.13% | -1.71% | -4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -2.26% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 1.01% | +0.08% |
Volatility
NOBOX vs. WFBIX - Volatility Comparison
Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) at 1.31%. This indicates that NOBOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOBOX | WFBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 1.31% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 2.80% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.13% | 3.97% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.09% | 6.40% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.03% | 5.17% | -0.14% |
NOBOX vs. WFBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOBOX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than WFBIX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NOBOX vs. WFBIX - Dividend Comparison
NOBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than WFBIX's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBOX Northern Bond Index Fund | 3.75% | 2.88% | 3.46% | 2.63% | 1.53% | 2.10% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 2.80% | 2.77% | 2.45% | 2.61% |
WFBIX iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund | 3.91% | 3.78% | 3.68% | 6.82% | 2.60% | 2.04% | 2.43% | 2.88% | 2.71% | 2.24% | 2.25% | 2.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOBOX and WFBIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NOBOX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to WFBIX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBOX dropped -20.03% vs WFBIX's -18.68%.
WFBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOBOX and WFBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer