PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NNOV vs. FBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NNOV vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November (NNOV) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNOV achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than FBUF's 3.62% return.


NNOV

1D
-1.13%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
8.17%
6M
7.35%
1Y
15.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBUF

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
3.62%
6M
3.09%
1Y
16.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NNOV vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NNOV
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November
8.17%11.20%2.87%
FBUF
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF
3.62%14.01%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between NNOV and FBUF is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2024

0.88

The correlation between NNOV and FBUF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NNOV vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NNOV
NNOV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
NNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FBUF
FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NNOV vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November (NNOV) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NNOVFBUFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.40

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.95

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.97

12.59

-2.62

NNOV vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NNOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the FBUF Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNOV and FBUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NNOV vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNOV drawdown since its inception was -12.80%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNOV and FBUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NNOVFBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.80%

-11.09%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.70%

-5.61%

-1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-1.83%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.40%

-1.38%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.31%

+0.23%

Volatility

NNOV vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November (NNOV) is 2.99%, while Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that NNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NNOVFBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.44%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.04%

6.11%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.26%

8.11%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.60%

9.69%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.60%

9.69%

+1.91%

NNOV vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

NNOV vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

NNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024
FBUF
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF
0.60%0.64%0.54%
NNOV
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NNOV and FBUF have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBUF has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to NNOV (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NNOV dropped -12.80% vs FBUF's -11.09%.

On 1-year performance, FBUF leads with 16.49% vs 15.31% for NNOV. On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, NNOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FBUF has performed better with a 16.49% return vs 15.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NNOV.

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for NNOV.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NNOV and 0.48% for FBUF.

FBUF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NNOV and FBUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer