NNOV vs. BUFF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NNOV (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. NNOV is actively managed, while BUFF is passively managed. Over the past year, NNOV returned 17.71% vs 14.36% for BUFF. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NNOV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BUFF.

Performance

NNOV vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November (NNOV) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNOV achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.42% return.

NNOV

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 3.59%
• YTD: 9.48%
• 6M: 9.00%
• 1Y: 17.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFF

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 1.68%
• YTD: 5.42%
• 6M: 5.90%
• 1Y: 14.36%
• 3Y*: 12.47%
• 5Y*: 8.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NNOV vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NNOV Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November	9.48%	11.20%	2.79%
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF	5.42%	11.02%	1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between NNOV and BUFF is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2024	0.87

The correlation between NNOV and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NNOV vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NNOV

NNOV Risk / Return Rank: 68
NNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
NNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
NNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
NNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
NNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 65

BUFF

BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 86
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NNOV vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November (NNOV) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NNOV	BUFF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	2.80	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	4.24	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.58	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	4.02	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.72	21.50	-9.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NNOV vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NNOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNOV and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NNOV	BUFF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	2.80	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	0.49	+0.84

Drawdowns

NNOV vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNOV drawdown since its inception was -12.80%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNOV and BUFF.

Drawdown Indicators

	NNOV	BUFF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.80%	-46.23%	+33.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.70%	-3.58%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.27%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.42%	-6.18%	+4.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	0.67%	+0.84%

Volatility

NNOV vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November (NNOV) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.02%. This indicates that NNOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NNOV	BUFF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.43%	1.02%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.69%	3.83%	+2.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.86%	5.15%	+2.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.58%	8.41%	+3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.58%	17.67%	-6.09%

NNOV vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

NNOV vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither NNOV nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.78%	1.26%	1.74%	1.55%	0.18%
NNOV Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NNOV and BUFF in my portfolio?

NNOV and BUFF have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NNOV or BUFF?

NNOV has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NNOV dropped -12.80% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

Which ETF is better, NNOV or BUFF?

On 1-year performance, NNOV leads with 17.71% vs 14.36% for BUFF. On fees, NNOV is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NNOV or BUFF?

Over the 1-year period, NNOV has performed better with a 17.71% return vs 14.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NNOV or BUFF?

NNOV is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NNOV or BUFF?

NNOV and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NNOV and BUFF?

Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NNOV and 0.89% for BUFF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.