PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NNE vs. QBTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NNE vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNE achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly higher than QBTS's -10.63% return.


NNE

1D
-1.57%
1M
-14.31%
YTD
-3.46%
6M
-34.54%
1Y
-28.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QBTS

1D
-1.89%
1M
9.00%
YTD
-10.63%
6M
-10.46%
1Y
47.17%
3Y*
123.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NNE vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NNE
NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.
-3.46%-3.55%591.53%
QBTS
D-Wave Quantum Inc
-10.63%211.31%508.70%

Correlation

The correlation between NNE and QBTS is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2024

0.47

Over the past year, NNE and QBTS have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NNE:

$1.20B

QBTS:

$8.59B

EPS

NNE:

-$202.05

QBTS:

-$1.08

PB Ratio

NNE:

0.00

QBTS:

7.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

NNE:

$0.00

QBTS:

$12.44M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NNE:

-$769.48K

QBTS:

$8.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

NNE:

$14.05B

QBTS:

-$399.03M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NNE vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NNE
NNE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
NNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NNE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
NNE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

QBTS
QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NNE vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NNEQBTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.16

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

0.67

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.69

1.16

-1.85

NNE vs. QBTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NNE Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the QBTS Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNE and QBTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NNE vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNE drawdown since its inception was -77.68%, smaller than the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNE and QBTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NNEQBTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.68%

-96.67%

+18.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.45%

-71.01%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.07%

-47.81%

-11.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.18%

-65.66%

+29.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.10%

40.64%

+0.46%

Volatility

NNE vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) is 32.64%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.66%. This indicates that NNE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NNEQBTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.64%

42.66%

-10.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.31%

76.89%

-7.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.66%

108.46%

-9.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

151.27%

150.99%

+0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

151.27%

150.99%

+0.28%

Dividends

NNE vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison

Neither NNE nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NNE vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
2.86M
(NNE) Total Revenue
(QBTS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NNE and QBTS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to NNE (32.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NNE dropped -77.68% vs QBTS's -96.67%.

QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NNE and QBTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer