NMULX vs. NML

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

NMULX (Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund) and NML (Neuberger Berman MLP) are both mutual funds - NMULX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Neuberger Berman, while NML is a MLPs fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman. Over the past 10 years, NMULX returned 13.41%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for NML. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NMULX charges 0.82%/yr vs 2.72%/yr for NML.

Performance

NMULX vs. NML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund (NMULX) and Neuberger Berman MLP (NML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMULX achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly lower than NML's 19.17% return. Over the past 10 years, NMULX has outperformed NML with an annualized return of 13.41%, while NML has yielded a comparatively lower 9.76% annualized return.

NMULX

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -0.98%
• YTD: 4.01%
• 6M: 2.78%
• 1Y: 13.98%
• 3Y*: 15.98%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: 13.41%

NML

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -6.15%
• YTD: 19.17%
• 6M: 20.30%
• 1Y: 20.20%
• 3Y*: 26.00%
• 5Y*: 22.98%
• 10Y*: 9.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMULX vs. NML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NMULX Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund	4.01%	14.81%	20.55%	18.35%	-17.68%	26.48%	12.47%	28.20%	-4.78%	24.90%
NML Neuberger Berman MLP	19.17%	4.36%	40.55%	14.61%	32.75%	61.76%	-45.84%	10.60%	-23.02%	7.07%

Correlation

The correlation between NMULX and NML is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2013	0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between NMULX and NML has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NMULX vs. NML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMULX

NMULX Risk / Return Rank: 30
NMULX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
NMULX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
NMULX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
NMULX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
NMULX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

NML

NML Risk / Return Rank: 24
NML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
NML Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
NML Omega Ratio Rank: 19
NML Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
NML Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMULX vs. NML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund (NMULX) and Neuberger Berman MLP (NML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NMULX	NML	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.18	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	1.65	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.21	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	2.10	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.52	5.59	+1.94

NMULX vs. NML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMULX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the NML Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMULX and NML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NMULX vs. NML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMULX drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, smaller than the maximum NML drawdown of -90.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMULX and NML.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMULX	NML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.00%	-90.48%	+34.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.51%	-9.67%	+1.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.50%	-16.92%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.05%	-21.40%	-4.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.41%	-84.84%	+45.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.40%	-7.30%	+4.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.56%	-36.94%	+27.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	3.63%	-1.56%

Volatility

NMULX vs. NML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund (NMULX) is 3.53%, while Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that NMULX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMULX	NML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	6.11%	-2.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.05%	13.70%	-4.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.63%	17.25%	-5.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.25%	23.81%	-2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.82%	35.08%	-14.26%

NMULX vs. NML - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMULX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than NML's 2.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMULX vs. NML - Dividend Comparison

NMULX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than NML's 7.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NML Neuberger Berman MLP	7.55%	8.24%	7.94%	10.19%	4.26%	3.54%	8.33%	9.76%	9.87%	7.04%	8.63%	15.44%
NMULX Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund	0.66%	0.69%	2.93%	22.77%	30.16%	34.21%	24.27%	20.47%	11.21%	10.49%	3.61%	3.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMULX and NML in my portfolio?

NMULX and NML have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMULX or NML?

NML has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to NMULX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMULX dropped -56.00% vs NML's -90.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NMULX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.