NMTRX vs. EACAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NMTRX (Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts) and EACAX (Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, NMTRX returned 2.36%/yr vs 2.33%/yr for EACAX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NMTRX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for EACAX.

Performance

NMTRX vs. EACAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund (EACAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMTRX achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than EACAX's 1.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NMTRX having a 2.36% annualized return and EACAX not far behind at 2.33%.

NMTRX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 2.47%
• 6M: 2.88%
• 1Y: 8.51%
• 3Y*: 4.20%
• 5Y*: 0.51%
• 10Y*: 2.36%

EACAX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 1.86%
• 6M: 2.16%
• 1Y: 7.77%
• 3Y*: 4.34%
• 5Y*: 1.51%
• 10Y*: 2.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMTRX vs. EACAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts	2.47%	3.90%	1.99%	6.21%	-11.98%	2.69%	5.25%	9.26%	1.06%	7.41%
EACAX Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund	1.86%	3.85%	3.25%	6.45%	-7.76%	0.53%	5.33%	8.32%	1.07%	4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between NMTRX and EACAX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007	0.79

The correlation between NMTRX and EACAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NMTRX vs. EACAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMTRX

NMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 79
NMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
NMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
NMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
NMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
NMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

EACAX

EACAX Risk / Return Rank: 68
EACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
EACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
EACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
EACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMTRX vs. EACAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund (EACAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NMTRX	EACAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	2.55	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.63	4.03	+0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.61	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	2.63	+0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.71	8.98	+2.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NMTRX vs. EACAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMTRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the EACAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMTRX and EACAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NMTRX	EACAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	2.55	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.39	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.64	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	1.01	-0.01

Drawdowns

NMTRX vs. EACAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMTRX drawdown since its inception was -16.36%, smaller than the maximum EACAX drawdown of -25.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMTRX and EACAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMTRX	EACAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.36%	-25.41%	+9.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.65%	-2.93%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.77%	-5.74%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.36%	-12.56%	-3.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.36%	-12.56%	-3.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.30%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.91%	-2.42%	-0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	0.85%	-0.13%

Volatility

NMTRX vs. EACAX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund (EACAX) have volatilities of 1.25% and 1.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMTRX	EACAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	1.27%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.26%	2.26%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.03%	3.04%	-0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.03%	3.94%	+0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.40%	3.67%	+0.73%

NMTRX vs. EACAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMTRX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EACAX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMTRX vs. EACAX - Dividend Comparison

NMTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than EACAX's 3.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EACAX Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund	3.50%	4.30%	3.88%	3.18%	2.09%	1.53%	2.04%	3.00%	2.61%	2.52%	2.74%	3.52%
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts	4.58%	4.46%	3.55%	3.67%	3.28%	2.73%	2.92%	3.20%	3.47%	3.28%	3.71%	3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMTRX and EACAX in my portfolio?

NMTRX and EACAX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMTRX or EACAX?

EACAX has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to NMTRX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMTRX dropped -16.36% vs EACAX's -25.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NMTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.