EACAX vs. VTI

In the year-to-date period, EACAX achieves a -2.56% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, EACAX has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 2.23%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.13% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

EACAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund (EACAX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EACAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EACAX and VTI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than VTI's 1.29% yield.

The maximum EACAX drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACAX and VTI.

The current volatility for Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund (EACAX) is 0.82%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that EACAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.