NMTRX vs. BDMAX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

NMTRX (Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts) and BDMAX (BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A) are both mutual funds - NMTRX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by BlackRock, while BDMAX is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, NMTRX returned 2.09%/yr vs 8.29%/yr for BDMAX. Their -0.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NMTRX charges 0.05%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for BDMAX.

Performance

NMTRX vs. BDMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A (BDMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMTRX achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than BDMAX's 12.73% return. Over the past 10 years, NMTRX has underperformed BDMAX with an annualized return of 2.09%, while BDMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.29% annualized return.

NMTRX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -2.16%
• 6M: 0.55%
• YTD: 1.25%
• 1Y: 6.51%
• 3Y*: 3.53%
• 5Y*: 0.03%
• 10Y*: 2.09%
• ALL TIME*: 3.95%

BDMAX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 2.45%
• 6M: 10.71%
• YTD: 12.73%
• 1Y: 24.19%
• 3Y*: 20.40%
• 5Y*: 13.04%
• 10Y*: 8.29%
• ALL TIME*: 6.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BDMAX BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

NMTRX vs. BDMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts	1.25%	3.90%	1.99%	6.21%	-11.98%	2.69%	5.25%	9.26%	1.06%	7.41%
BDMAX BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A	12.73%	18.08%	21.12%	14.27%	1.57%	3.11%	-0.05%	-1.02%	1.86%	12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between NMTRX and BDMAX is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.00
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.01
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	-0.00

Return for Risk

NMTRX vs. BDMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NMTRX

NMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 84
NMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
NMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
NMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
NMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
NMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

BDMAX

BDMAX Risk / Return Rank: 97
BDMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BDMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BDMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BDMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
BDMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NMTRX vs. BDMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A (BDMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NMTRX	BDMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	3.29	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	4.76	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.62	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	7.50	-4.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.17	19.83	-10.66

NMTRX vs. BDMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMTRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the BDMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMTRX and BDMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NMTRX vs. BDMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMTRX drawdown since its inception was -16.36%, which is greater than BDMAX's maximum drawdown of -12.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMTRX and BDMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMTRX	BDMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.36%	-12.37%	-3.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.65%	-3.25%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.77%	-4.15%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.36%	-5.56%	-10.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.36%	-9.71%	-6.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.16%	-0.35%	-1.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.89%	-2.80%	-0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	1.23%	-0.48%

Volatility

NMTRX vs. BDMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) is 0.92%, while BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A (BDMAX) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that NMTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMTRX	BDMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	2.66%	-1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.42%	5.40%	-2.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.03%	7.42%	-4.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.04%	6.68%	-2.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.40%	5.91%	-1.51%

NMTRX vs. BDMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMTRX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BDMAX's 1.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMTRX vs. BDMAX - Dividend Comparison

NMTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than BDMAX's 11.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BDMAX BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A	11.57%	8.94%	13.39%	7.14%	0.00%	1.25%	0.04%	6.60%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	1.56%
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts	4.31%	4.46%	3.55%	3.67%	3.28%	2.73%	2.92%	3.20%	3.47%	3.28%	3.71%	3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMTRX and BDMAX in my portfolio?

NMTRX and BDMAX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMTRX or BDMAX?

BDMAX has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to NMTRX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMTRX dropped -16.36% vs BDMAX's -12.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.