PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMT vs. DNYMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMT vs. DNYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMT) and DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMT achieves a 15.87% return, which is significantly higher than DNYMX's 1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, NMT has outperformed DNYMX with an annualized return of 2.58%, while DNYMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.30% annualized return.


NMT

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.10%
YTD
15.87%
6M
15.57%
1Y
16.25%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
2.58%

DNYMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.28%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
1.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMT vs. DNYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMT
Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund
15.87%5.77%16.29%2.58%-30.45%12.42%6.47%25.65%-14.05%13.80%
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
1.18%2.69%2.87%2.76%-1.17%-0.10%1.26%2.42%1.02%1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between NMT and DNYMX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.16

The correlation between NMT and DNYMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMT vs. DNYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMT
NMT Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

DNYMX
DNYMX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DNYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DNYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMT vs. DNYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMT) and DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NMTDNYMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

4.07

-2.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

12.12

-9.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.93

54.48

-45.55

NMT vs. DNYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the DNYMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMT and DNYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NMT vs. DNYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMT drawdown since its inception was -40.12%, which is greater than DNYMX's maximum drawdown of -3.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMT and DNYMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMTDNYMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.12%

-3.19%

-36.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

-0.24%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.28%

-0.98%

-12.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.88%

-2.53%

-36.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.88%

-3.19%

-35.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.74%

0.00%

-3.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-0.41%

-8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

0.05%

+1.77%

Volatility

NMT vs. DNYMX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMT) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) at 0.18%. This indicates that NMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNYMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMTDNYMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

0.18%

+2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

0.48%

+7.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.92%

0.65%

+9.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.32%

0.88%

+11.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.07%

1.05%

+13.02%

NMT vs. DNYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMT has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DNYMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NMT vs. DNYMX - Dividend Comparison

NMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than DNYMX's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.65%2.36%2.73%1.92%0.70%0.59%1.06%1.31%1.21%1.04%1.08%0.00%
NMT
Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.12%7.27%5.94%3.06%4.50%3.43%3.60%3.46%4.66%4.57%5.30%5.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMT and DNYMX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMT has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to DNYMX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMT dropped -40.12% vs DNYMX's -3.19%.

DNYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMT and DNYMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer