PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMIMX vs. VSMPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMIMX vs. VSMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund (NMIMX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMIMX achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than VSMPX's 11.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NMIMX having a 15.13% annualized return and VSMPX not far ahead at 15.14%.


NMIMX

1D
0.06%
1M
5.44%
YTD
9.04%
6M
10.33%
1Y
27.85%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
14.18%
10Y*
15.13%

VSMPX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.76%
YTD
11.99%
6M
11.88%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
15.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMIMX vs. VSMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMIMX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund
9.04%16.99%25.64%26.24%-16.99%31.73%15.48%25.87%-5.07%24.13%
VSMPX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.99%17.15%23.26%26.53%-19.50%25.74%21.01%30.79%-5.16%21.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NMIMX and VSMPX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.99

The correlation between NMIMX and VSMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMIMX vs. VSMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMIMX
NMIMX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NMIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NMIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMPX
VSMPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VSMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMIMX vs. VSMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund (NMIMX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMIMXVSMPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.38

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.13

15.59

-2.46

NMIMX vs. VSMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMIMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the VSMPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMIMX and VSMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMIMXVSMPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.47

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.76

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.83

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.83

-0.21

Drawdowns

NMIMX vs. VSMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMIMX drawdown since its inception was -55.46%, which is greater than VSMPX's maximum drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMIMX and VSMPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMIMXVSMPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.46%

-34.97%

-20.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-8.92%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

-19.36%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.06%

-25.35%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.47%

-34.97%

+0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-4.59%

-2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.93%

+0.26%

Volatility

NMIMX vs. VSMPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund (NMIMX) is 2.62%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that NMIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMIMXVSMPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.95%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

9.19%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

12.19%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

17.36%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

18.41%

-0.16%

NMIMX vs. VSMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMIMX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMIMX vs. VSMPX - Dividend Comparison

NMIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.97%, more than VSMPX's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMIMX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund
11.97%13.05%13.52%4.87%9.00%28.11%7.52%4.15%12.30%12.94%1.60%2.30%
VSMPX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
1.02%1.13%1.27%1.43%1.67%1.22%1.43%1.78%2.05%1.73%1.95%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, NMIMX and VSMPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VSMPX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to NMIMX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMIMX dropped -55.46% vs VSMPX's -34.97%.

VSMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMIMX and VSMPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer