PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMIIX vs. NMTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMIIX vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund (NMIIX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NMIIX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

NMTRX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-2.16%
6M
0.55%
YTD
1.25%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
2.09%
ALL TIME*
3.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NMIIX vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMIIX
Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund
0.12%3.89%1.22%3.99%-8.39%0.88%4.31%6.51%0.97%3.30%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
1.25%3.90%1.99%6.21%-11.98%2.69%5.25%9.26%1.06%7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NMIIX and NMTRX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013

0.84

The correlation between NMIIX and NMTRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMIIX vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NMIIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NMTRX
NMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NMIIX vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund (NMIIX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NMIIXNMTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

NMIIX vs. NMTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NMIIX vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMIIXNMTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

Volatility

NMIIX vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMIIXNMTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.40%

NMIIX vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMIIX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMIIX vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison

NMIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than NMTRX's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMIIX
Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund
2.30%2.92%2.69%1.77%1.33%1.83%2.23%2.82%2.47%2.32%3.41%2.84%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
4.31%4.46%3.55%3.67%3.28%2.73%2.92%3.20%3.47%3.28%3.71%3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMIIX and NMTRX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMIIX and NMTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer