PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMIIX vs. NBGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMIIX vs. NBGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund (NMIIX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMIIX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than NBGIX's 6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, NMIIX has underperformed NBGIX with an annualized return of 1.39%, while NBGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.17% annualized return.


NMIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.43%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
3.01%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
1.39%

NBGIX

1D
0.56%
1M
0.47%
YTD
6.58%
6M
4.25%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMIIX vs. NBGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMIIX
Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund
0.12%3.89%1.22%3.99%-8.39%0.88%4.31%6.51%0.97%3.30%
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
6.58%-4.55%9.20%15.73%-19.35%18.25%25.07%29.68%-6.76%16.02%

Correlation

The correlation between NMIIX and NBGIX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2013

-0.06

The correlation between NMIIX and NBGIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMIIX vs. NBGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMIIX
NMIIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NMIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NMIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

NBGIX
NBGIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NBGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMIIX vs. NBGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund (NMIIX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMIIXNBGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.11

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

0.86

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

2.30

+5.42

NMIIX vs. NBGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the NBGIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMIIX and NBGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMIIXNBGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

0.57

+1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.14

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.46

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.54

+0.05

Drawdowns

NMIIX vs. NBGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMIIX drawdown since its inception was -12.34%, smaller than the maximum NBGIX drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMIIX and NBGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMIIXNBGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.34%

-51.62%

+39.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.19%

-10.75%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.64%

-27.48%

+22.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.34%

-28.27%

+15.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.34%

-34.53%

+22.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-9.08%

+7.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-7.47%

+4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

3.98%

-3.42%

Volatility

NMIIX vs. NBGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund (NMIIX) is 0.59%, while Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that NMIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMIIXNBGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

4.06%

-3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.46%

11.31%

-9.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93%

16.04%

-14.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.07%

19.66%

-16.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.21%

20.23%

-17.02%

NMIIX vs. NBGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMIIX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than NBGIX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMIIX vs. NBGIX - Dividend Comparison

NMIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than NBGIX's 15.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
15.40%16.41%2.14%3.13%11.11%10.91%3.87%6.00%12.49%14.10%6.53%11.28%
NMIIX
Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund
2.79%2.92%2.69%1.77%1.33%1.83%2.23%2.82%2.47%2.32%3.41%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMIIX and NBGIX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBGIX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to NMIIX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMIIX dropped -12.34% vs NBGIX's -51.62%.

NMIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMIIX and NBGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer