PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMFIX vs. VGENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMFIX vs. VGENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Vanguard Energy Fund Investor Shares (VGENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMFIX achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than VGENX's 20.03% return. Over the past 10 years, NMFIX has underperformed VGENX with an annualized return of 7.38%, while VGENX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.44% annualized return.


NMFIX

1D
0.55%
1M
-1.93%
YTD
8.64%
6M
8.44%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
7.38%

VGENX

1D
1.24%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
20.03%
6M
18.09%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
28.15%
5Y*
22.01%
10Y*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMFIX vs. VGENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMFIX
Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
8.64%23.11%1.74%6.62%-7.21%13.68%-2.59%24.34%-10.26%22.17%
VGENX
Vanguard Energy Fund Investor Shares
20.03%20.67%30.25%8.78%23.59%27.71%-30.85%13.23%-17.19%3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between NMFIX and VGENX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2013

0.62

The correlation between NMFIX and VGENX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMFIX vs. VGENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMFIX
NMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
NMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
NMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VGENX
VGENX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VGENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGENX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VGENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGENX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMFIX vs. VGENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Vanguard Energy Fund Investor Shares (VGENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMFIXVGENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.48

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

5.82

-3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

20.05

-12.31

NMFIX vs. VGENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the VGENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMFIX and VGENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMFIXVGENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.74

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

1.18

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.41

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.44

+0.08

Drawdowns

NMFIX vs. VGENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMFIX drawdown since its inception was -34.93%, smaller than the maximum VGENX drawdown of -65.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFIX and VGENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMFIXVGENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.93%

-65.37%

+30.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-5.71%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.03%

-12.30%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.76%

-19.72%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.93%

-61.19%

+26.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-4.26%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-14.94%

+9.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.65%

+0.43%

Volatility

NMFIX vs. VGENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) is 3.25%, while Vanguard Energy Fund Investor Shares (VGENX) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that NMFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMFIXVGENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

4.92%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.33%

10.21%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

12.14%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

18.71%

-4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

23.20%

-7.74%

NMFIX vs. VGENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMFIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than VGENX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMFIX vs. VGENX - Dividend Comparison

NMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, less than VGENX's 7.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMFIX
Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
5.59%6.03%3.82%2.78%3.98%10.13%2.11%2.47%10.33%7.71%2.53%2.01%
VGENX
Vanguard Energy Fund Investor Shares
7.14%4.71%33.96%6.83%4.63%3.63%4.46%3.30%2.96%2.96%1.84%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMFIX and VGENX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGENX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to NMFIX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMFIX dropped -34.93% vs VGENX's -65.37%.

VGENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMFIX and VGENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer