NMFIX vs. RGIYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NMFIX (Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund) and RGIYX (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NMFIX returned 7.38%/yr vs 8.08%/yr for RGIYX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NMFIX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RGIYX.

Performance

NMFIX vs. RGIYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NMFIX having a 8.64% return and RGIYX slightly lower at 8.53%. Over the past 10 years, NMFIX has underperformed RGIYX with an annualized return of 7.38%, while RGIYX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.08% annualized return.

NMFIX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -1.93%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 8.44%
• 1Y: 16.19%
• 3Y*: 12.04%
• 5Y*: 6.93%
• 10Y*: 7.38%

RGIYX

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: 8.53%
• 6M: 8.20%
• 1Y: 14.23%
• 3Y*: 14.13%
• 5Y*: 9.04%
• 10Y*: 8.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMFIX vs. RGIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund	8.64%	23.11%	1.74%	6.62%	-7.21%	13.68%	-2.59%	24.34%	-10.26%	22.17%
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund	8.53%	20.07%	9.96%	6.94%	-2.95%	12.44%	-3.37%	27.98%	-9.87%	18.96%

Correlation

The correlation between NMFIX and RGIYX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2013	0.93

The correlation between NMFIX and RGIYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NMFIX vs. RGIYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMFIX

NMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 28
NMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
NMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
NMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
NMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
NMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

RGIYX

RGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 29
RGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
RGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
RGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
RGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
RGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMFIX vs. RGIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NMFIX	RGIYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.40	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	2.00	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.25	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	2.33	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.75	7.94	-0.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NMFIX vs. RGIYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the RGIYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMFIX and RGIYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NMFIX	RGIYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26	1.40	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.67	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.51	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.52	0.00

Drawdowns

NMFIX vs. RGIYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMFIX drawdown since its inception was -34.93%, smaller than the maximum RGIYX drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFIX and RGIYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMFIX	RGIYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.93%	-39.17%	+4.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.20%	-6.00%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.03%	-13.74%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.76%	-20.19%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.93%	-39.17%	+4.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.12%	-3.71%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.31%	-4.68%	-0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	1.76%	+0.32%

Volatility

NMFIX vs. RGIYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) is 3.25%, while Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that NMFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMFIX	RGIYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	3.53%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.33%	8.20%	+3.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.91%	10.03%	+2.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.85%	13.57%	+0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.46%	15.93%	-0.47%

NMFIX vs. RGIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMFIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than RGIYX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMFIX vs. RGIYX - Dividend Comparison

NMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, less than RGIYX's 8.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund	5.59%	6.03%	3.82%	2.78%	3.98%	10.13%	2.11%	2.47%	10.33%	7.71%	2.53%	2.01%
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund	8.80%	9.39%	5.64%	2.76%	3.46%	17.26%	7.80%	15.89%	9.20%	11.32%	6.70%	5.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMFIX and RGIYX in my portfolio?

NMFIX and RGIYX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMFIX or RGIYX?

RGIYX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to NMFIX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMFIX dropped -34.93% vs RGIYX's -39.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGIYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.