NMFIX vs. FSENX
Compare and contrast key facts about Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX).
NMFIX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Sep 17, 2012. FSENX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 14, 1981.
Performance
NMFIX vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMFIX vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 6.79% | 23.11% | 1.74% | 6.62% | -7.21% | 13.68% | -2.59% | 24.34% | -10.26% | 22.17% |
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio | 40.53% | 10.56% | 4.26% | 0.94% | 62.98% | 55.31% | -32.51% | 9.90% | -24.94% | -2.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMFIX achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 40.53% return. Over the past 10 years, NMFIX has underperformed FSENX with an annualized return of 7.52%, while FSENX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.42% annualized return.
NMFIX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 22.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
FSENX
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 10.46%
- YTD
- 40.53%
- 6M
- 42.43%
- 1Y
- 47.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.38%
- 5Y*
- 26.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMFIX vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMFIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NMFIX vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank
NMFIX
FSENX
NMFIX vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMFIX | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 1.98 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.28 | 2.47 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 2.37 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 8.33 | +3.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMFIX | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.98 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.98 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.37 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.33 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMFIX and FSENX is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NMFIX vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison
NMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than FSENX's 1.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 5.68% | 6.03% | 3.82% | 2.78% | 3.98% | 10.13% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 10.33% | 7.71% | 2.53% | 2.01% |
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio | 1.38% | 1.95% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.50% | 2.25% | 3.43% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 1.74% | 0.62% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
NMFIX vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMFIX drawdown since its inception was -34.93%, smaller than the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFIX and FSENX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMFIX | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -76.24% | +41.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.81% | -19.96% | +12.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.76% | -28.02% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.93% | -72.11% | +37.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -1.22% | -4.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.34% | -17.06% | +11.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 5.69% | -3.75% |
Volatility
NMFIX vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) is 3.83%, while Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that NMFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMFIX | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 5.09% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 13.62% | -3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 24.68% | -10.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 27.41% | -13.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 30.99% | -15.56% |