PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMFIX vs. DPG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMFIX vs. DPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Duff & Phelps Utility and Infrastructure Fund Inc (DPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMFIX achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than DPG's 17.91% return. Over the past 10 years, NMFIX has underperformed DPG with an annualized return of 7.17%, while DPG has yielded a comparatively higher 7.83% annualized return.


NMFIX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.20%
6M
4.02%
YTD
9.45%
1Y
15.43%
3Y*
12.65%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
7.17%
ALL TIME*
7.61%

DPG

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.78%
6M
10.11%
YTD
17.91%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
23.61%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
7.83%
ALL TIME*
4.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$795.48K$886.55K$1.03M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NMFIX vs. DPG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMFIX
Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
9.45%23.11%1.74%6.62%-7.21%13.68%-2.59%24.34%-10.26%22.17%
DPG
Duff & Phelps Utility and Infrastructure Fund Inc
17.91%16.33%38.22%-25.07%3.15%30.37%-8.91%40.68%-15.84%9.12%

Correlation

The correlation between NMFIX and DPG is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.60

The correlation between NMFIX and DPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMFIX vs. DPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NMFIX
NMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

DPG
DPG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NMFIX vs. DPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Duff & Phelps Utility and Infrastructure Fund Inc (DPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NMFIXDPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.81

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.29

9.17

-2.88

NMFIX vs. DPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the DPG Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMFIX and DPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NMFIX vs. DPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMFIX drawdown since its inception was -34.93%, smaller than the maximum DPG drawdown of -64.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFIX and DPG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMFIXDPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.93%

-64.61%

+29.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-5.85%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.21%

-16.94%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.76%

-41.11%

+18.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.93%

-64.61%

+29.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.41%

-3.10%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-13.26%

+7.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.43%

+0.10%

Volatility

NMFIX vs. DPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) is 1.95%, while Duff & Phelps Utility and Infrastructure Fund Inc (DPG) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that NMFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMFIXDPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

2.95%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

9.70%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

12.13%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

20.91%

-7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.29%

28.88%

-13.59%

NMFIX vs. DPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMFIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than DPG's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMFIX vs. DPG - Dividend Comparison

NMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, less than DPG's 5.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DPG
Duff & Phelps Utility and Infrastructure Fund Inc
5.84%6.61%7.19%12.21%10.36%9.70%11.48%9.21%11.81%9.02%9.03%9.50%
NMFIX
Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
5.47%6.03%3.82%2.78%3.98%10.13%2.11%2.47%10.33%7.71%2.53%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMFIX and DPG have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DPG has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to NMFIX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMFIX dropped -34.93% vs DPG's -64.61%.

DPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMFIX and DPG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer