NMB vs. ZMUN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NMB (Simplify National Muni Bond ETF) and ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. NMB is actively managed, while ZMUN is passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NMB charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZMUN.

Performance

NMB vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify National Muni Bond ETF (NMB) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMB achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than ZMUN's 1.57% return.

NMB

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: 0.91%
• 1Y: 5.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZMUN

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 1.57%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMB vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NMB Simplify National Muni Bond ETF	1.19%	0.32%
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF	1.57%	0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between NMB and ZMUN is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.13

Return for Risk

NMB vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMB

NMB Risk / Return Rank: 21
NMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
NMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
NMB Omega Ratio Rank: 22
NMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
NMB Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMB vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify National Muni Bond ETF (NMB) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NMB	ZMUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.96	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NMB	ZMUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	6.46	-6.13

Drawdowns

NMB vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMB drawdown since its inception was -13.68%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMB and ZMUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMB	ZMUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.68%	-0.09%	-13.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-0.02%	-1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-0.01%	-3.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NMB	ZMUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.74%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.42%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.13%	0.54%	+7.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.70%	0.54%	+12.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.70%	0.54%	+12.16%

NMB vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMB has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMB vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison

NMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NMB Simplify National Muni Bond ETF	5.87%	4.48%	1.13%
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF	2.28%	0.70%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMB and ZMUN in my portfolio?

NMB and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NMB or ZMUN?

On fees, ZMUN is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NMB or ZMUN?

ZMUN is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for NMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NMB or ZMUN?

NMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.

What is the main difference between NMB and ZMUN?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for NMB and 0.30% for ZMUN.