NMAY vs. FFTY

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NMAY (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - May) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NMAY is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NMAY returned 14.06% vs 43.43% for FFTY. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NMAY charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.

Performance

NMAY vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - May (NMAY) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMAY achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 26.26% return.

NMAY

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 5.89%
• 6M: 6.02%
• 1Y: 14.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFTY

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: 10.03%
• YTD: 26.26%
• 6M: 22.29%
• 1Y: 43.43%
• 3Y*: 23.01%
• 5Y*: 0.68%
• 10Y*: 8.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMAY vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NMAY Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - May	5.89%	12.39%
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	26.26%	30.40%

Correlation

The correlation between NMAY and FFTY is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025	0.61

The correlation between NMAY and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NMAY vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMAY

NMAY Risk / Return Rank: 90
NMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
NMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
NMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 92
NMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FFTY

FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 35
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMAY vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - May (NMAY) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NMAY	FFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	1.22	+1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.87	1.65	+2.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.22	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.11	1.87	+3.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.11	4.94	+25.17

NMAY vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the FFTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMAY and FFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NMAY vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMAY drawdown since its inception was -2.76%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMAY and FFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMAY	FFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.76%	-59.46%	+56.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.76%	-23.29%	+20.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-59.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-11.01%	+10.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.24%	-22.34%	+22.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.47%	8.81%	-8.34%

Volatility

NMAY vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - May (NMAY) is 3.14%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 12.58%. This indicates that NMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMAY	FFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	12.58%	-9.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.45%	28.19%	-23.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.33%	35.80%	-30.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.69%	29.57%	-23.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.69%	27.65%	-21.96%

NMAY vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMAY vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

NMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	1.07%	1.35%	0.91%	0.65%	2.75%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%
NMAY Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMAY and FFTY in my portfolio?

NMAY and FFTY have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMAY or FFTY?

FFTY has higher volatility (12.58%) compared to NMAY (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMAY dropped -2.76% vs FFTY's -59.46%.

Which ETF is better, NMAY or FFTY?

On 1-year performance, FFTY leads with 43.43% vs 14.06% for NMAY. On fees, NMAY is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, NMAY has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NMAY or FFTY?

Over the 1-year period, FFTY has performed better with a 43.43% return vs 14.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NMAY or FFTY?

NMAY is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NMAY or FFTY?

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for NMAY.

What is the main difference between NMAY and FFTY?

NMAY is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. NMAY tracks Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, while FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NMAY and 0.80% for FFTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.