NMAR vs. NVDO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

NMAR (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - March) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. NMAR is passively managed, while NVDO is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NMAR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.

Performance

NMAR vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - March (NMAR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMAR achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 16.35% return.

NMAR

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 0.22%
• 6M: 8.01%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 1Y: 15.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.48%
• 6M: 16.25%
• YTD: 16.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMAR vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NMAR Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - March	8.64%	4.25%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	16.35%	10.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NMAR and NVDO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025	0.56

Return for Risk

NMAR vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMAR

NMAR Risk / Return Rank: 90
NMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
NMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
NMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
NMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
NMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

NVDO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMAR vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - March (NMAR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NMAR	NVDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.63	—	—

Drawdowns

NMAR vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMAR drawdown since its inception was -10.61%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMAR and NVDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMAR	NVDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.61%	-16.25%	+5.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-4.73%	+4.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.87%	-4.96%	+4.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.73%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NMAR	NVDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.44%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.70%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.62%	31.20%	-24.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.09%	31.20%	-20.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.09%	31.20%	-20.11%

NMAR vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMAR vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

NMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.32%.

Position	TTM	2025
NMAR Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	14.32%	16.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMAR and NVDO in my portfolio?

NMAR and NVDO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NMAR or NVDO?

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NMAR or NVDO?

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NMAR or NVDO?

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 0.00% for NMAR.

What is the main difference between NMAR and NVDO?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NMAR and 0.77% for NVDO.