NKTR vs. CCEC
NKTR (Nektar Therapeutics) and CCEC (Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp) are both stocks. NKTR operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while CCEC operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past year, NKTR returned 390.21% vs 3.54% for CCEC. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
NKTR vs. CCEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NKTR achieves a 38.51% return, which is significantly higher than CCEC's 13.04% return.
NKTR
- 1D
- -8.30%
- 1M
- -32.27%
- YTD
- 38.51%
- 6M
- 6.76%
- 1Y
- 390.21%
- 3Y*
- 84.73%
- 5Y*
- -26.23%
- 10Y*
- -13.07%
CCEC
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 12.89%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 3.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NKTR vs. CCEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NKTR Nektar Therapeutics | 38.51% | 203.08% | -31.62% |
CCEC Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp | 13.04% | 17.01% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between NKTR and CCEC is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2024 | -0.03 |
Fundamentals
NKTR:
$1.45B
CCEC:
$1.37B
NKTR:
-$8.64
CCEC:
$4.01
NKTR:
19.26
CCEC:
3.26
NKTR:
$55.63M
CCEC:
$418.16M
NKTR:
$44.58M
CCEC:
$240.75M
NKTR:
-$121.05M
CCEC:
$338.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NKTR vs. CCEC — Risk / Return Rank
NKTR
CCEC
NKTR vs. CCEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp (CCEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NKTR | CCEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 0.09 | +2.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.22 | 0.44 | +4.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.05 | +0.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.43 | 0.11 | +9.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.73 | 0.25 | +21.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NKTR | CCEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 0.09 | +2.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.59 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
NKTR vs. CCEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NKTR drawdown since its inception was -99.61%, which is greater than CCEC's maximum drawdown of -28.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NKTR and CCEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NKTR | CCEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.61% | -28.04% | -71.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.54% | -28.04% | -18.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.40% | -3.36% | -93.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.31% | -8.48% | -59.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.20% | 12.61% | +7.59% |
Volatility
NKTR vs. CCEC - Volatility Comparison
Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp (CCEC) have volatilities of 10.93% and 10.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NKTR | CCEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.93% | 10.69% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.10% | 27.83% | +36.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 185.99% | 41.02% | +144.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 121.81% | 39.64% | +82.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.16% | 39.64% | +57.52% |
Dividends
NKTR vs. CCEC - Dividend Comparison
NKTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CCEC Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp | 3.25% | 2.87% | 0.82% |
NKTR Nektar Therapeutics | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NKTR vs. CCEC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nektar Therapeutics and Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NKTR and CCEC have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NKTR has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to CCEC (10.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NKTR dropped -99.61% vs CCEC's -28.04%.
NKTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NKTR and CCEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer