PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCEC vs. AVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCEC vs. AVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp (CCEC) and Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCEC achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly lower than AVO's 14.91% return.


CCEC

1D
-0.80%
1M
4.45%
6M
13.12%
YTD
9.22%
1Y
-4.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVO

1D
-0.15%
1M
19.02%
6M
9.17%
YTD
14.91%
1Y
9.80%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
-8.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCEC vs. AVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp
9.22%17.01%15.33%
AVO
Mission Produce, Inc.
14.91%-19.28%36.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CCEC and AVO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2024

-0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCEC:

$1.34B

AVO:

$941.87M

EPS

CCEC:

$3.99

AVO:

$0.32

PE Ratio

CCEC:

5.59

AVO:

41.47

PS Ratio

CCEC:

3.16

AVO:

0.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCEC:

$418.16M

AVO:

$1.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCEC:

$240.75M

AVO:

$152.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

CCEC:

$338.22M

AVO:

$83.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCEC vs. AVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCEC
CCEC Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CCEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCEC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CCEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCEC Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

AVO
AVO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
AVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCEC vs. AVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp (CCEC) and Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCECAVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.07

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

0.20

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

0.58

-0.93

CCEC vs. AVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the AVO Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCEC and AVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCEC vs. AVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCEC drawdown since its inception was -28.04%, smaller than the maximum AVO drawdown of -62.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEC and AVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCECAVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.04%

-62.71%

+34.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.04%

-34.09%

+6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.62%

-41.25%

+34.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-38.12%

+29.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.00%

11.88%

+1.12%

Volatility

CCEC vs. AVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp (CCEC) is 7.21%, while Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) has a volatility of 12.98%. This indicates that CCEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCECAVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.21%

12.98%

-5.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.07%

28.97%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.98%

36.01%

+4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.64%

35.84%

+3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.64%

36.88%

+2.76%

Dividends

CCEC vs. AVO - Dividend Comparison

CCEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, while AVO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
AVO
Mission Produce, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp
3.36%2.87%0.82%

Financials

CCEC vs. AVO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp and Mission Produce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
99.51M
290.90M
(CCEC) Total Revenue
(AVO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCEC vs. AVO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp and Mission Produce, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
53.9%
7.1%
Portfolio components
CCEC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp reported a gross profit of 53.60M and revenue of 99.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.9%.

AVO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Mission Produce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.50M and revenue of 290.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.1%.

CCEC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp reported an operating income of 50.01M and revenue of 99.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.3%.

AVO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Mission Produce, Inc. reported an operating income of -7.00M and revenue of 290.90M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.4%.

CCEC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp reported a net income of 23.76M and revenue of 99.51M, resulting in a net margin of 23.9%.

AVO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Mission Produce, Inc. reported a net income of -7.20M and revenue of 290.90M, resulting in a net margin of -2.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCEC and AVO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVO has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to CCEC (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCEC dropped -28.04% vs AVO's -62.71%.

AVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCEC and AVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer