PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NJAN vs. PBFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NJAN vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NJAN vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NJAN
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January
-2.82%14.20%6.46%
PBFR
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF
-0.75%10.44%5.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NJAN achieves a -2.82% return, which is significantly lower than PBFR's -0.75% return.


NJAN

1D
1.72%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
-2.82%
6M
0.34%
1Y
15.09%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*

PBFR

1D
1.19%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
1.42%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NJAN vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NJAN vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NJAN
NJAN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PBFR
PBFR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PBFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBFR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PBFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBFR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NJAN vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NJANPBFRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

1.34

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

1.99

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.84

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.34

10.86

-1.52

NJAN vs. PBFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NJAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the PBFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NJAN and PBFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NJANPBFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.34

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.20

-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between NJAN and PBFR is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NJAN vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison

NJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


Drawdowns

NJAN vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NJAN drawdown since its inception was -20.70%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJAN and PBFR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NJANPBFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.70%

-8.50%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-6.15%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.29%

-1.56%

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-0.68%

-3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.04%

+0.56%

Volatility

NJAN vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) at 2.42%. This indicates that NJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NJANPBFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

2.42%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.74%

3.46%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

8.18%

+4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.34%

7.13%

+5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.06%

7.13%

+5.93%