NJAN vs. BFEB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NJAN (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January) and BFEB (Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February) are both exchange-traded funds - NJAN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while BFEB is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NJAN returned 7.53%/yr vs 11.29%/yr for BFEB. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

NJAN vs. BFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NJAN achieves a 6.20% return, which is significantly lower than BFEB's 7.13% return.

NJAN

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: -0.40%
• YTD: 6.20%
• 6M: 6.59%
• 1Y: 16.94%
• 3Y*: 13.59%
• 5Y*: 7.53%
• 10Y*: —

BFEB

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 7.13%
• 6M: 6.83%
• 1Y: 19.04%
• 3Y*: 15.76%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NJAN vs. BFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NJAN Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January	6.20%	14.20%	15.35%	20.95%	-18.92%	11.55%	7.75%
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February	7.13%	12.99%	17.58%	22.35%	-6.76%	18.05%	6.01%

Correlation

The correlation between NJAN and BFEB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2020	0.84

The correlation between NJAN and BFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NJAN vs. BFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NJAN

NJAN Risk / Return Rank: 77
NJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
NJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
NJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
NJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 76

BFEB

BFEB Risk / Return Rank: 77
BFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
BFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NJAN vs. BFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NJAN	BFEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.30	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	3.25	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.44	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	2.98	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.62	14.92	-1.30

NJAN vs. BFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the BFEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NJAN and BFEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NJAN vs. BFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NJAN drawdown since its inception was -20.70%, smaller than the maximum BFEB drawdown of -27.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJAN and BFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	NJAN	BFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.70%	-27.20%	+6.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.90%	-6.41%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.14%	-13.82%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.70%	-14.84%	-5.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-1.31%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-2.77%	-1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	1.28%	-0.03%

Volatility

NJAN vs. BFEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) is 2.45%, while Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) has a volatility of 2.70%. This indicates that NJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NJAN	BFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.45%	2.70%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.15%	6.75%	-0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.29%	8.34%	-1.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.33%	11.43%	+0.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.90%	14.25%	-1.35%

NJAN vs. BFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NJAN and BFEB have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

NJAN vs. BFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither NJAN nor BFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NJAN and BFEB in my portfolio?

NJAN and BFEB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NJAN or BFEB?

BFEB has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to NJAN (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJAN dropped -20.70% vs BFEB's -27.20%.

Which ETF is better, NJAN or BFEB?

On 5-year performance, BFEB leads with 11.29% vs 7.53% for NJAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, NJAN has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NJAN or BFEB?

Over the 5-year period, BFEB has performed better with a 11.29% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NJAN or BFEB?

NJAN and BFEB have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NJAN or BFEB?

NJAN and BFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NJAN and BFEB?

NJAN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BFEB is Options Trading. NJAN tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while BFEB tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.