NJAN vs. DJAN
NJAN (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January) and DJAN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January) are both exchange-traded funds - NJAN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while DJAN is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest. NJAN is passively managed, while DJAN is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, NJAN returned 8.15%/yr vs 7.75%/yr for DJAN. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DJAN.
Performance
NJAN vs. DJAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NJAN achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly higher than DJAN's 5.04% return.
NJAN
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 8.25%
- 1Y
- 18.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- —
DJAN
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 15.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- —
NJAN vs. DJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NJAN Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January | 7.27% | 14.20% | 15.35% | 20.95% | -18.92% | 11.22% |
DJAN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January | 5.04% | 11.09% | 13.05% | 13.81% | -5.73% | 6.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between NJAN and DJAN is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between NJAN and DJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
NJAN vs. DJAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NJAN
DJAN
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
NJAN
DJAN
Communication Services
NJAN
DJAN
Consumer Cyclical
NJAN
DJAN
Consumer Defensive
NJAN
DJAN
Healthcare
NJAN
DJAN
Industrials
NJAN
DJAN
Utilities
NJAN
DJAN
Basic Materials
NJAN
DJAN
Energy
NJAN
DJAN
Financial Services
NJAN
DJAN
Real Estate
NJAN
DJAN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NJAN vs. DJAN — Risk / Return Rank
NJAN
DJAN
NJAN vs. DJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NJAN | DJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.58 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 3.68 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.27 | 18.44 | -3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NJAN | DJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.80 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 1.11 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.16 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
NJAN vs. DJAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NJAN drawdown since its inception was -20.70%, which is greater than DJAN's maximum drawdown of -9.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJAN and DJAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NJAN | DJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.70% | -9.57% | -11.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.90% | -4.27% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | -9.33% | -3.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.70% | -9.57% | -11.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.01% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -1.91% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 0.85% | +0.38% |
Volatility
NJAN vs. DJAN - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) at 0.96%. This indicates that NJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NJAN | DJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 0.96% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.72% | 4.26% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.03% | 5.61% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 7.01% | +5.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 6.92% | +6.00% |
NJAN vs. DJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
NJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DJAN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
NJAN vs. DJAN - Dividend Comparison
Neither NJAN nor DJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NJAN and DJAN have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NJAN has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to DJAN (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJAN dropped -20.70% vs DJAN's -9.57%.
On 5-year performance, NJAN leads with 8.15% vs 7.75% for DJAN. On fees, NJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, DJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NJAN has performed better with a 8.15% return vs 7.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJAN.
NJAN and DJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
NJAN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DJAN is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NJAN and 0.85% for DJAN.
DJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NJAN and DJAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer