PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NJAN vs. LOUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NJAN vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NJAN achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 29.15% return.


NJAN

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.16%
YTD
7.27%
6M
8.25%
1Y
18.67%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*

LOUP

1D
0.73%
1M
15.35%
YTD
29.15%
6M
27.05%
1Y
75.12%
3Y*
37.54%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NJAN vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NJAN
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January
7.27%14.20%15.35%20.95%-18.92%11.55%8.29%
LOUP
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF
29.15%43.24%21.80%51.31%-46.00%7.54%81.62%

Correlation

The correlation between NJAN and LOUP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.78

The correlation between NJAN and LOUP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

NJAN vs. LOUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NJAN
LOUP

Technology

54.2%
51.0%

Communication Services

15.5%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%

-

Healthcare

4.2%
2.7%

Industrials

2.8%
20.0%

Utilities

1.4%
2.8%

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Energy

0.6%
2.9%

Financial Services

0.2%
4.5%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

NJAN
54.2%
LOUP
51.0%

Communication Services

NJAN
15.5%
LOUP
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

NJAN
12.2%
LOUP
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

NJAN
7.6%
LOUP

-

Healthcare

NJAN
4.2%
LOUP
2.7%

Industrials

NJAN
2.8%
LOUP
20.0%

Utilities

NJAN
1.4%
LOUP
2.8%

Basic Materials

NJAN
1.2%
LOUP

-

Energy

NJAN
0.6%
LOUP
2.9%

Financial Services

NJAN
0.2%
LOUP
4.5%

Real Estate

NJAN
0.1%
LOUP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NJAN vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NJAN
NJAN Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

LOUP
LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NJAN vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NJANLOUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.41

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

3.60

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.27

12.17

+3.10

NJAN vs. LOUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the LOUP Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NJAN and LOUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NJANLOUPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.65

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.41

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.59

+0.06

Drawdowns

NJAN vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NJAN drawdown since its inception was -20.70%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJAN and LOUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NJANLOUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.70%

-58.68%

+37.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.90%

-21.00%

+15.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-35.23%

+22.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.70%

-55.63%

+34.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-1.16%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-20.03%

+16.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

6.19%

-4.96%

Volatility

NJAN vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) is 1.06%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 7.74%. This indicates that NJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NJANLOUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

7.74%

-6.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.72%

21.94%

-16.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.03%

28.50%

-21.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.29%

32.38%

-20.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.92%

31.96%

-19.04%

NJAN vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

NJAN vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison

Neither NJAN nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NJAN and LOUP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LOUP has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to NJAN (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJAN dropped -20.70% vs LOUP's -58.68%.

On 5-year performance, LOUP leads with 13.15% vs 8.15% for NJAN. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, NJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 13.15% return vs 8.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NJAN.

NJAN and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NJAN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LOUP is Technology Equities. NJAN tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NJAN and 0.70% for LOUP.

NJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NJAN and LOUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer