NJAN vs. BUFF
NJAN (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - NJAN tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while BUFF tracks the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NJAN returned 8.17%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for BUFF. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BUFF.
Performance
NJAN vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NJAN achieves a 7.34% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.42% return.
NJAN
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- 7.34%
- 6M
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 18.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- —
NJAN vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NJAN Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January | 7.34% | 14.20% | 15.35% | 20.95% | -18.92% | 11.55% | 8.29% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.42% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | -13.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between NJAN and BUFF is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020 | 0.77 |
The correlation between NJAN and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
NJAN vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NJAN
BUFF
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
NJAN
BUFF
Communication Services
NJAN
BUFF
Consumer Cyclical
NJAN
BUFF
Consumer Defensive
NJAN
BUFF
Healthcare
NJAN
BUFF
Industrials
NJAN
BUFF
Utilities
NJAN
BUFF
Basic Materials
NJAN
BUFF
Energy
NJAN
BUFF
Financial Services
NJAN
BUFF
Real Estate
NJAN
BUFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NJAN vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
NJAN
BUFF
NJAN vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NJAN | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.58 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 4.02 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.47 | 21.50 | -6.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NJAN | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 2.80 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 1.04 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.49 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
NJAN vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NJAN drawdown since its inception was -20.70%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJAN and BUFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NJAN | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.70% | -46.23% | +25.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.90% | -3.58% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | -10.24% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.70% | -10.24% | -10.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.27% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -6.18% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 0.67% | +0.56% |
Volatility
NJAN vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) have volatilities of 1.07% and 1.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NJAN | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 1.02% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.72% | 3.83% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.04% | 5.15% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 8.41% | +3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 17.67% | -4.74% |
NJAN vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
NJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
NJAN vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
Neither NJAN nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
NJAN Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NJAN and BUFF have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NJAN has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJAN dropped -20.70% vs BUFF's -46.23%.
On 5-year performance, BUFF leads with 8.71% vs 8.17% for NJAN. On fees, NJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 8.71% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
NJAN and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
NJAN tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NJAN and 0.89% for BUFF.
BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NJAN and BUFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer