PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NJAN vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NJAN vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NJAN achieves a 7.34% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.42% return.


NJAN

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.59%
YTD
7.34%
6M
8.46%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*

BUFF

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.68%
YTD
5.42%
6M
5.90%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NJAN vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NJAN
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January
7.34%14.20%15.35%20.95%-18.92%11.55%8.29%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
5.42%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%8.37%-13.34%

Correlation

The correlation between NJAN and BUFF is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.77

The correlation between NJAN and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

NJAN vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NJAN
BUFF

Technology

54.2%
36.2%

Communication Services

15.5%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
4.9%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.4%

Industrials

2.8%
8.1%

Utilities

1.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.8%

Energy

0.6%
3.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.9%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

NJAN
54.2%
BUFF
36.2%

Communication Services

NJAN
15.5%
BUFF
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

NJAN
12.2%
BUFF
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

NJAN
7.6%
BUFF
4.9%

Healthcare

NJAN
4.2%
BUFF
8.4%

Industrials

NJAN
2.8%
BUFF
8.1%

Utilities

NJAN
1.4%
BUFF
2.3%

Basic Materials

NJAN
1.2%
BUFF
1.8%

Energy

NJAN
0.6%
BUFF
3.5%

Financial Services

NJAN
0.2%
BUFF
11.9%

Real Estate

NJAN
0.1%
BUFF
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NJAN vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NJAN
NJAN Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
NJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NJAN vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NJANBUFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.58

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

4.02

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.47

21.50

-6.03

NJAN vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NJAN and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NJANBUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.80

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.04

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.49

+0.16

Drawdowns

NJAN vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NJAN drawdown since its inception was -20.70%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJAN and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NJANBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.70%

-46.23%

+25.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.90%

-3.58%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-10.24%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.70%

-10.24%

-10.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.27%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-6.18%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

0.67%

+0.56%

Volatility

NJAN vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) have volatilities of 1.07% and 1.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NJANBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

1.02%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.72%

3.83%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.04%

5.15%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.30%

8.41%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.93%

17.67%

-4.74%

NJAN vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

NJAN vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither NJAN nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%
NJAN
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NJAN and BUFF have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NJAN has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJAN dropped -20.70% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

On 5-year performance, BUFF leads with 8.71% vs 8.17% for NJAN. On fees, NJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 8.71% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

NJAN and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NJAN tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NJAN and 0.89% for BUFF.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NJAN and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer