PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NISYX vs. AMFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NISYX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund (NISYX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NISYX achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than AMFIX's 0.30% return.


NISYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.45%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
0.65%
10Y*

AMFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.04%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.48%
1Y
2.53%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NISYX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NISYX
American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund
0.52%7.34%2.91%5.88%-13.42%-0.01%1.27%
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
0.30%3.74%3.48%3.84%-6.26%-1.37%-0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NISYX and AMFIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.81

The correlation between NISYX and AMFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NISYX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NISYX
NISYX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NISYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NISYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NISYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NISYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
NISYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFIX
AMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
AMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NISYX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund (NISYX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NISYXAMFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.51

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

3.43

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.81

11.54

-5.73

NISYX vs. AMFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NISYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the AMFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NISYX and AMFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NISYXAMFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.43

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.35

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.56

-0.46

Drawdowns

NISYX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NISYX drawdown since its inception was -17.97%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NISYX and AMFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NISYXAMFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-9.35%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-0.74%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.81%

-0.88%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.97%

-8.91%

-9.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-0.39%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-2.03%

-4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.22%

+0.75%

Volatility

NISYX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison

American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund (NISYX) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.41%. This indicates that NISYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NISYXAMFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

0.41%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

0.83%

+1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.89%

1.04%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.60%

2.17%

+3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.34%

1.74%

+3.60%

NISYX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NISYX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

NISYX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison

NISYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than AMFIX's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
2.21%2.08%2.44%1.70%0.83%0.57%0.83%1.24%1.24%0.40%
NISYX
American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund
4.48%4.37%4.42%3.17%2.27%2.09%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NISYX and AMFIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NISYX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to AMFIX (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NISYX dropped -17.97% vs AMFIX's -9.35%.

AMFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NISYX and AMFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer