NIPAX vs. PUDZX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

NIPAX (Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Conservative Portfolio) and PUDZX (PGIM Real Assets Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, NIPAX returned 5.68%/yr vs 6.80%/yr for PUDZX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NIPAX charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PUDZX.

Performance

NIPAX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Conservative Portfolio (NIPAX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIPAX achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 12.95% return. Over the past 10 years, NIPAX has underperformed PUDZX with an annualized return of 5.68%, while PUDZX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.80% annualized return.

NIPAX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 4.84%
• 6M: 5.13%
• 1Y: 14.80%
• 3Y*: 10.91%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 5.68%

PUDZX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -1.38%
• YTD: 12.95%
• 6M: 12.88%
• 1Y: 21.50%
• 3Y*: 13.39%
• 5Y*: 7.94%
• 10Y*: 6.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIPAX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NIPAX Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Conservative Portfolio	4.84%	13.17%	8.07%	12.30%	-15.45%	7.44%	10.00%	14.31%	-4.84%	9.59%
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund	12.95%	13.40%	8.61%	3.26%	-2.76%	18.49%	4.84%	16.29%	-9.20%	6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between NIPAX and PUDZX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between NIPAX and PUDZX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NIPAX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIPAX

NIPAX Risk / Return Rank: 60
NIPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
NIPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
NIPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
NIPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
NIPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

PUDZX

PUDZX Risk / Return Rank: 89
PUDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PUDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
PUDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
PUDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PUDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIPAX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Conservative Portfolio (NIPAX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NIPAX	PUDZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	2.88	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.93	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.54	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	6.06	-3.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.00	22.03	-10.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NIPAX vs. PUDZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the PUDZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIPAX and PUDZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NIPAX	PUDZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	2.88	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.76	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.70	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.54	+0.34

Drawdowns

NIPAX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIPAX drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, which is greater than PUDZX's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIPAX and PUDZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NIPAX	PUDZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.77%	-21.53%	-5.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.82%	-3.56%	-2.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.56%	-8.20%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.93%	-17.98%	-1.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.93%	-21.53%	+1.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-2.19%	+1.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.66%	-5.26%	+2.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	0.98%	+0.24%

Volatility

NIPAX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Conservative Portfolio (NIPAX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) have volatilities of 2.05% and 2.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NIPAX	PUDZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.05%	2.07%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.33%	6.06%	-0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.49%	7.49%	-1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.71%	10.53%	-2.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.28%	9.70%	-2.42%

NIPAX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIPAX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

NIPAX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison

NIPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than PUDZX's 7.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NIPAX Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Conservative Portfolio	3.28%	4.05%	3.24%	4.23%	6.79%	9.83%	5.37%	4.49%	7.06%	3.07%	3.42%	4.49%
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund	7.73%	8.93%	6.67%	3.66%	9.10%	13.00%	4.94%	3.40%	2.14%	2.10%	1.39%	1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NIPAX and PUDZX in my portfolio?

NIPAX and PUDZX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NIPAX or PUDZX?

PUDZX has higher volatility (2.07%) compared to NIPAX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIPAX dropped -26.77% vs PUDZX's -21.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PUDZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.