PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIOG vs. ASMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NIOG vs. ASMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIOG achieves a -24.92% return, which is significantly lower than ASMG's 128.07% return.


NIOG

1D
-6.74%
1M
-14.17%
YTD
-24.92%
6M
-20.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASMG

1D
-2.00%
1M
11.41%
YTD
128.07%
6M
129.18%
1Y
248.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIOG vs. ASMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NIOG and ASMG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIOG vs. ASMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIOG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ASMG
ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIOG vs. ASMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NIOGASMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.93

NIOG vs. ASMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NIOG vs. ASMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIOG drawdown since its inception was -52.95%, which is greater than ASMG's maximum drawdown of -43.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIOG and ASMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIOGASMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.95%

-43.95%

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.95%

-17.62%

-35.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.49%

-12.93%

-9.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.95%

Volatility

NIOG vs. ASMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIOGASMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

115.64%

87.47%

+28.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

115.64%

87.64%

+28.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

115.64%

87.64%

+28.00%

NIOG vs. ASMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NIOG and ASMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

NIOG vs. ASMG - Dividend Comparison

NIOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NIOG and ASMG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NIOG and ASMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

ASMG has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.00% for NIOG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIOG and ASMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer