NINLX vs. FSSNX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NINLX (Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund) and FSSNX (Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NINLX returned 13.12%/yr vs 11.85%/yr for FSSNX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NINLX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FSSNX.

Performance

NINLX vs. FSSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NINLX achieves a 23.42% return, which is significantly higher than FSSNX's 21.76% return. Over the past 10 years, NINLX has outperformed FSSNX with an annualized return of 13.12%, while FSSNX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.85% annualized return.

NINLX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 23.42%
• 6M: 21.53%
• 1Y: 54.93%
• 3Y*: 19.54%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: 13.12%

FSSNX

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: 21.76%
• 6M: 18.99%
• 1Y: 42.83%
• 3Y*: 19.92%
• 5Y*: 7.03%
• 10Y*: 11.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NINLX vs. FSSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NINLX Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund	23.42%	18.20%	7.62%	13.89%	-20.22%	26.42%	27.14%	24.92%	-10.56%	16.81%
FSSNX Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund	21.76%	12.94%	11.71%	17.11%	-20.28%	14.70%	19.99%	25.70%	-11.24%	14.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NINLX and FSSNX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011	0.95

The correlation between NINLX and FSSNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NINLX vs. FSSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NINLX

NINLX Risk / Return Rank: 87
NINLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
NINLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
NINLX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
NINLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NINLX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FSSNX

FSSNX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FSSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FSSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FSSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FSSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FSSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NINLX vs. FSSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NINLX	FSSNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	2.26	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	3.08	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.37	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.06	4.05	+2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.52	14.35	+7.17

NINLX vs. FSSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NINLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the FSSNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NINLX and FSSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NINLX vs. FSSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NINLX drawdown since its inception was -59.95%, which is greater than FSSNX's maximum drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINLX and FSSNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NINLX	FSSNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.95%	-41.72%	-18.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.39%	-11.00%	+1.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.46%	-27.45%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.71%	-31.87%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.43%	-41.72%	-2.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	0.00%	-1.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.89%	-8.27%	-1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	3.10%	-0.47%

Volatility

NINLX vs. FSSNX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX) at 6.43%. This indicates that NINLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NINLX	FSSNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.43%	6.43%	+1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.41%	14.33%	+1.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.08%	19.75%	+1.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.88%	22.67%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.17%	23.50%	-0.33%

NINLX vs. FSSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NINLX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FSSNX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

NINLX vs. FSSNX - Dividend Comparison

NINLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than FSSNX's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSSNX Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund	0.89%	1.08%	1.04%	1.43%	1.26%	3.92%	0.94%	2.96%	4.94%	3.37%	2.27%	2.66%
NINLX Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund	3.45%	4.25%	0.92%	0.25%	3.76%	6.40%	1.62%	2.85%	14.51%	5.19%	1.42%	5.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NINLX and FSSNX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, NINLX and FSSNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NINLX or FSSNX?

NINLX has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to FSSNX (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NINLX dropped -59.95% vs FSSNX's -41.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NINLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.