NINDX vs. FZILX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

NINDX (Columbia Large Cap Index Fund) and FZILX (Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund) are both mutual funds - NINDX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Columbia, while FZILX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index. Over the past 5 years, NINDX returned 13.01%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for FZILX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NINDX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FZILX.

Performance

NINDX vs. FZILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NINDX achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly lower than FZILX's 13.24% return.

NINDX

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -1.36%
• YTD: 8.12%
• 6M: 6.79%
• 1Y: 22.24%
• 3Y*: 20.59%
• 5Y*: 13.01%
• 10Y*: 15.39%

FZILX

• 1D: -2.85%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 13.24%
• 6M: 13.24%
• 1Y: 28.61%
• 3Y*: 19.59%
• 5Y*: 8.88%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NINDX vs. FZILX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NINDX Columbia Large Cap Index Fund	8.12%	17.56%	24.83%	26.09%	-18.11%	28.62%	18.10%	31.36%	-10.45%
FZILX Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund	13.24%	33.52%	5.32%	16.28%	-15.96%	8.19%	11.06%	21.69%	-9.38%

Correlation

The correlation between NINDX and FZILX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018	0.78

The correlation between NINDX and FZILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NINDX vs. FZILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NINDX

NINDX Risk / Return Rank: 54
NINDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
NINDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
NINDX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
NINDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
NINDX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FZILX

FZILX Risk / Return Rank: 52
FZILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FZILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FZILX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FZILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FZILX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NINDX vs. FZILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NINDX	FZILX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.94	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.62	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.36	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	2.73	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.93	10.51	+1.42

NINDX vs. FZILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NINDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the FZILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NINDX and FZILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NINDX vs. FZILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NINDX drawdown since its inception was -55.32%, which is greater than FZILX's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINDX and FZILX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NINDX	FZILX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.32%	-34.37%	-20.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-11.24%	+2.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.78%	-13.47%	-5.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.60%	-29.87%	+5.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.16%	-2.85%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-6.66%	-2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	2.92%	-0.94%

Volatility

NINDX vs. FZILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) is 4.92%, while Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that NINDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NINDX	FZILX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.92%	7.02%	-2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.94%	13.81%	-3.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.58%	15.85%	-3.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.02%	15.77%	+1.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.09%	17.41%	+0.68%

NINDX vs. FZILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NINDX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FZILX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

NINDX vs. FZILX - Dividend Comparison

NINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.34%, more than FZILX's 2.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FZILX Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund	2.36%	2.67%	3.00%	2.98%	2.71%	2.61%	1.64%	2.37%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NINDX Columbia Large Cap Index Fund	18.34%	27.15%	8.71%	8.82%	13.23%	16.96%	7.23%	9.84%	9.43%	4.21%	2.24%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NINDX and FZILX in my portfolio?

NINDX and FZILX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NINDX or FZILX?

FZILX has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to NINDX (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NINDX dropped -55.32% vs FZILX's -34.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.