PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NINDX vs. GEGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NINDX vs. GEGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) and Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund (GEGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NINDX having a 11.64% return and GEGTX slightly lower at 11.29%. Over the past 10 years, NINDX has underperformed GEGTX with an annualized return of 15.43%, while GEGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.


NINDX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.79%
YTD
11.64%
6M
11.78%
1Y
28.73%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
15.43%

GEGTX

1D
-0.38%
1M
8.62%
YTD
11.29%
6M
10.25%
1Y
30.15%
3Y*
25.15%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NINDX vs. GEGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NINDX
Columbia Large Cap Index Fund
11.64%17.56%24.83%26.09%-18.11%28.62%18.10%31.36%-4.85%21.23%
GEGTX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund
11.29%16.44%31.91%43.94%-32.01%29.40%34.43%36.17%-3.88%28.00%

Correlation

The correlation between NINDX and GEGTX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 1993

0.93

The correlation between NINDX and GEGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NINDX vs. GEGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NINDX
NINDX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
NINDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NINDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NINDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NINDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NINDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GEGTX
GEGTX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GEGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GEGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NINDX vs. GEGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) and Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund (GEGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NINDXGEGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.35

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

2.05

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.49

7.33

+8.16

NINDX vs. GEGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NINDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the GEGTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NINDX and GEGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NINDXGEGTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.04

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.68

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.82

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.67

-0.04

Drawdowns

NINDX vs. GEGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NINDX drawdown since its inception was -55.32%, roughly equal to the maximum GEGTX drawdown of -53.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINDX and GEGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NINDXGEGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.32%

-53.08%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-15.25%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-23.67%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.60%

-35.64%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.82%

-35.64%

+1.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.38%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-9.92%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

4.25%

-2.34%

Volatility

NINDX vs. GEGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) is 2.83%, while Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund (GEGTX) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that NINDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NINDXGEGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

3.53%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

11.66%

-2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

15.34%

-3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

21.63%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

21.28%

-3.21%

NINDX vs. GEGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NINDX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GEGTX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

NINDX vs. GEGTX - Dividend Comparison

NINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.32%, more than GEGTX's 7.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEGTX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund
7.92%8.81%5.29%4.12%0.00%8.54%12.38%8.02%9.24%6.28%1.81%10.17%
NINDX
Columbia Large Cap Index Fund
24.32%27.15%8.71%8.82%13.23%16.96%7.23%9.84%9.43%4.21%2.24%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, NINDX and GEGTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GEGTX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to NINDX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NINDX dropped -55.32% vs GEGTX's -53.08%.

NINDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NINDX and GEGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer