NIM vs. NOM
NIM (Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund) and NOM (Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Nuveen. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NIM vs. NOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NIM
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 6.39%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.69%
NOM
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NIM vs. NOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIM Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund | 0.55% | 10.88% | 2.74% | 0.75% | -12.95% | 2.95% | 5.44% | 12.77% | -0.49% | 5.40% |
NOM Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund | -5.66% | 6.89% | 27.11% | -0.84% | -26.11% | 8.91% | 1.20% | 30.63% | -15.20% | -3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between NIM and NOM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995 | 0.07 |
The correlation between NIM and NOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NIM vs. NOM — Risk / Return Rank
NIM
NOM
NIM vs. NOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund (NIM) and Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund (NOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NIM | NOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NIM | NOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | — | — |
Drawdowns
NIM vs. NOM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NIM | NOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.96% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | — | — |
Volatility
NIM vs. NOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NIM | NOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.03% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.62% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.78% | — | — |
Dividends
NIM vs. NOM - Dividend Comparison
NIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than NOM's 6.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIM Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund | 3.73% | 3.61% | 4.10% | 3.49% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 3.42% | 3.03% | 3.27% | 3.15% | 3.23% | 3.27% |
NOM Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund | 6.28% | 6.58% | 5.45% | 3.17% | 4.45% | 3.60% | 3.43% | 3.60% | 4.82% | 4.74% | 4.51% | 4.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NIM and NOM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NIM and NOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer