PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIM vs. MMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NIM vs. MMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund (NIM) and Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIM achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than MMU's 2.52% return. Over the past 10 years, NIM has outperformed MMU with an annualized return of 1.82%, while MMU has yielded a comparatively lower 1.38% annualized return.


NIM

1D
0.27%
1M
1.11%
YTD
1.69%
6M
2.18%
1Y
7.26%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
1.82%

MMU

1D
-0.05%
1M
3.73%
YTD
2.52%
6M
3.61%
1Y
12.20%
3Y*
7.74%
5Y*
-0.24%
10Y*
1.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIM vs. MMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NIM
Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund
1.69%10.88%2.74%0.75%-12.95%2.95%5.44%12.77%-0.49%5.40%
MMU
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc
2.52%9.19%6.58%5.63%-19.58%5.83%0.71%10.08%-4.55%8.30%

Correlation

The correlation between NIM and MMU is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994

0.17

The correlation between NIM and MMU shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.43 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIM vs. MMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIM
NIM Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
NIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIM Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
NIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIM Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MMU
MMU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMU Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMU Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIM vs. MMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund (NIM) and Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NIMMMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.29

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.08

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.67

7.02

-4.35

NIM vs. MMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the MMU Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIM and MMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NIM vs. MMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIM drawdown since its inception was -23.09%, smaller than the maximum MMU drawdown of -34.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIM and MMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIMMMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.09%

-34.51%

+11.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-5.88%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.83%

-12.86%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.96%

-31.89%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.96%

-34.51%

+14.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.90%

-4.66%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-6.83%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

1.74%

+0.99%

Volatility

NIM vs. MMU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund (NIM) is 1.62%, while Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU) has a volatility of 2.40%. This indicates that NIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIMMMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

2.40%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

7.09%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.99%

8.34%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.58%

10.69%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.78%

13.01%

-2.23%

NIM vs. MMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than MMU's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NIM vs. MMU - Dividend Comparison

NIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than MMU's 6.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMU
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc
6.31%6.26%6.16%4.36%4.65%3.88%4.21%4.96%5.68%5.37%5.67%5.50%
NIM
Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund
3.71%3.61%4.10%3.49%2.88%2.69%3.42%3.03%3.27%3.15%3.23%3.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


NIM and MMU have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMU has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to NIM (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIM dropped -23.09% vs MMU's -34.51%.

MMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIM and MMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer