PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIKL vs. GBUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NIKL vs. GBUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIKL achieves a -7.50% return, which is significantly lower than GBUG's -1.44% return.


NIKL

1D
0.76%
1M
-13.19%
YTD
-7.50%
6M
4.95%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
-3.02%
5Y*
10Y*

GBUG

1D
1.17%
1M
0.96%
YTD
-1.44%
6M
7.57%
1Y
63.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIKL vs. GBUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
-7.50%54.51%
GBUG
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF
-1.44%119.00%

Correlation

The correlation between NIKL and GBUG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.55

The correlation between NIKL and GBUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIKL vs. GBUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIKL
NIKL Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
NIKL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIKL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIKL Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NIKL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIKL Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

GBUG
GBUG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GBUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GBUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIKL vs. GBUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NIKLGBUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.24

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

1.97

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

5.05

-2.82

NIKL vs. GBUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIKL Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the GBUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIKL and GBUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NIKLGBUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

1.33

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

1.74

-1.85

Drawdowns

NIKL vs. GBUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIKL drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, which is greater than GBUG's maximum drawdown of -32.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIKL and GBUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIKLGBUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.23%

-32.10%

-28.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.87%

-32.10%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.33%

-25.98%

-3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-7.68%

-18.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.42%

12.52%

-0.10%

Volatility

NIKL vs. GBUG - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) have volatilities of 15.35% and 15.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIKLGBUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.35%

15.44%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.55%

39.41%

-3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.12%

47.62%

-5.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.60%

47.31%

-14.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.60%

47.31%

-14.71%

NIKL vs. GBUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIKL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GBUG's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

NIKL vs. GBUG - Dividend Comparison

NIKL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than GBUG's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GBUG
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF
1.58%1.56%0.00%0.00%
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
2.73%2.53%3.49%19.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


NIKL and GBUG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GBUG has higher volatility (15.44%) compared to NIKL (15.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIKL dropped -60.23% vs GBUG's -32.10%.

On 1-year performance, GBUG leads with 63.04% vs 27.58% for NIKL. On fees, NIKL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GBUG has performed better with a 63.04% return vs 27.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NIKL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for GBUG.

NIKL has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 1.58% for GBUG.

NIKL is categorized as Energy Equities, while GBUG is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NIKL and 0.89% for GBUG.

GBUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIKL and GBUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer