PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIKL vs. COPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NIKL vs. COPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIKL achieves a -8.20% return, which is significantly lower than COPP's 26.69% return.


NIKL

1D
-8.49%
1M
-14.45%
YTD
-8.20%
6M
5.56%
1Y
32.72%
3Y*
-3.41%
5Y*
10Y*

COPP

1D
-3.50%
1M
22.98%
YTD
26.69%
6M
39.51%
1Y
111.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIKL vs. COPP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
-8.20%52.05%-13.98%
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
26.69%74.02%4.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NIKL and COPP is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.63

The correlation between NIKL and COPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

NIKL vs. COPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NIKL
COPP

Basic Materials

100.0%
92.0%

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.1%

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

0.9%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Technology

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

0.1%

Basic Materials

NIKL
100.0%
COPP
92.0%

Communication Services

NIKL

-

COPP
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

NIKL

-

COPP
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

NIKL

-

COPP
0.1%

Energy

NIKL

-

COPP
0.1%

Financial Services

NIKL

-

COPP
0.9%

Healthcare

NIKL

-

COPP
0.1%

Industrials

NIKL

-

COPP
0.1%

Real Estate

NIKL

-

COPP
0.0%

Technology

NIKL

-

COPP
0.1%

Utilities

NIKL

-

COPP
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIKL vs. COPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIKL
NIKL Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NIKL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIKL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIKL Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
NIKL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIKL Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

COPP
COPP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
COPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPP Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
COPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIKL vs. COPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NIKLCOPPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.38

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

3.88

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.67

13.39

-10.72

NIKL vs. COPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIKL Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the COPP Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIKL and COPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NIKLCOPPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

2.62

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

1.11

-1.22

Drawdowns

NIKL vs. COPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIKL drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, which is greater than COPP's maximum drawdown of -44.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIKL and COPP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIKLCOPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.23%

-44.37%

-15.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.87%

-28.91%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.87%

-3.50%

-26.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-14.02%

-12.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.29%

8.35%

+3.94%

Volatility

NIKL vs. COPP - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) have volatilities of 15.28% and 15.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIKLCOPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.28%

15.22%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.54%

36.30%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.12%

42.84%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.62%

40.80%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.62%

40.80%

-8.18%

NIKL vs. COPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIKL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COPP's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

NIKL vs. COPP - Dividend Comparison

NIKL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than COPP's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
1.87%2.37%2.59%0.00%
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
2.75%2.53%3.49%19.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


NIKL and COPP have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NIKL has higher volatility (15.28%) compared to COPP (15.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIKL dropped -60.23% vs COPP's -44.37%.

On 1-year performance, COPP leads with 111.49% vs 32.72% for NIKL. On fees, COPP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, COPP has performed better with a 111.49% return vs 32.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COPP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NIKL.

NIKL has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 1.87% for COPP.

NIKL is categorized as Energy Equities, while COPP is Commodity Producers Equities. NIKL tracks Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while COPP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NIKL and 0.65% for COPP.

COPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIKL and COPP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer