NIHI vs. QDVO
Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO).
NIHI and QDVO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NIHI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Sep 16, 2025. QDVO is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Aug 22, 2024.
Performance
NIHI vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NIHI vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NIHI NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF | 0.34% | 5.33% |
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | -4.93% | 3.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NIHI achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly higher than QDVO's -4.93% return.
NIHI
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVO
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- -4.93%
- 6M
- -2.40%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NIHI vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NIHI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NIHI vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank
NIHI
QDVO
NIHI vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NIHI | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.92 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between NIHI and QDVO is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NIHI vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison
NIHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, less than QDVO's 11.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NIHI NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF | 6.40% | 3.44% | 0.00% |
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 11.17% | 9.92% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
NIHI vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NIHI drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, smaller than the maximum QDVO drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIHI and QDVO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NIHI | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -17.75% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.28% | -6.70% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -2.51% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.75% | — |
Volatility
NIHI vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NIHI | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 18.61% | -3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 18.01% | -2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 18.01% | -2.49% |