PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIHI vs. DCMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NIHI vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIHI achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 27.82% return.


NIHI

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.14%
6M
4.12%
YTD
6.79%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DCMT

1D
1.19%
1M
4.31%
6M
23.72%
YTD
27.82%
1Y
30.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIHI vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NIHI
NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF
6.79%4.89%
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
27.82%-1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between NIHI and DCMT is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIHI vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIHI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DCMT
DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIHI vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NIHIDCMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

NIHI vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NIHI vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIHI drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIHI and DCMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIHIDCMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-15.96%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-8.25%

+6.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-3.54%

+1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

Volatility

NIHI vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIHIDCMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.89%

18.79%

-3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.89%

16.01%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.89%

16.01%

-1.12%

NIHI vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIHI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

NIHI vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

NIHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.63%, more than DCMT's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
2.87%3.67%1.59%
NIHI
NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF
8.63%3.44%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NIHI and DCMT have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DCMT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DCMT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for NIHI.

NIHI has the higher dividend yield at 8.63%, compared with 2.87% for DCMT.

NIHI is categorized as Derivative Income, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for NIHI and 0.66% for DCMT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIHI and DCMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer