NIHI vs. BILZ
NIHI (NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF) and BILZ (PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NIHI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while BILZ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. NIHI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILZ.
Performance
NIHI vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NIHI achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than BILZ's 1.80% return.
NIHI
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILZ
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NIHI vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NIHI NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF | 7.52% | 4.89% |
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 1.80% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between NIHI and BILZ is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NIHI vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank
NIHI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BILZ
NIHI vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NIHI | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 45.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 198.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1,889.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NIHI vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NIHI drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIHI and BILZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NIHI | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -0.52% | -10.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -0.01% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
NIHI vs. BILZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NIHI | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.07% | 0.21% | +14.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 0.52% | +14.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 0.52% | +14.55% |
NIHI vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NIHI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
NIHI vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison
NIHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.57%, more than BILZ's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 4.02% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 2.23% |
NIHI NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF | 8.57% | 3.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NIHI and BILZ have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for NIHI.
NIHI has the higher dividend yield at 8.57%, compared with 4.02% for BILZ.
NIHI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BILZ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Neos and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for NIHI and 0.14% for BILZ.
Find the right allocation for NIHI and BILZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer