NIE vs. TCBIX
NIE (Virtus Equity & Convertible Income Fund) and TCBIX (The Covered Bridge Fund) are both Derivative Income funds. Over the past 10 years, NIE returned 13.53%/yr vs 7.51%/yr for TCBIX. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NIE charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for TCBIX.
Performance
NIE vs. TCBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NIE achieves a 8.69% return, which is significantly lower than TCBIX's 11.04% return. Over the past 10 years, NIE has outperformed TCBIX with an annualized return of 13.53%, while TCBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.51% annualized return.
NIE
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- 8.69%
- 1Y
- 20.42%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.44%
TCBIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- YTD
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 19.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.55%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.43M | $1.33M | $1.69M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NIE vs. TCBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIE Virtus Equity & Convertible Income Fund | 8.69% | 12.15% | 28.64% | 26.71% | -26.73% | 18.89% | 33.78% | 31.09% | -5.69% | 23.68% |
TCBIX The Covered Bridge Fund | 11.04% | 12.61% | 4.09% | 4.09% | 0.05% | 18.21% | -1.71% | 18.73% | -3.93% | 9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between NIE and TCBIX is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2013 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NIE and TCBIX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NIE vs. TCBIX — Risk / Return Rank
NIE
TCBIX
NIE vs. TCBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Equity & Convertible Income Fund (NIE) and The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NIE | TCBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.35 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 3.27 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.40 | 10.74 | -2.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NIE vs. TCBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NIE drawdown since its inception was -57.90%, which is greater than TCBIX's maximum drawdown of -28.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIE and TCBIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NIE | TCBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.90% | -28.94% | -28.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | -5.26% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.79% | -12.73% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.04% | -17.07% | -13.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.99% | -28.94% | -10.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.39% | -0.21% | -3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -3.45% | -4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 1.61% | +0.69% |
Volatility
NIE vs. TCBIX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Equity & Convertible Income Fund (NIE) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX) at 2.92%. This indicates that NIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NIE | TCBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 2.92% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | 6.45% | +4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.59% | 8.80% | +3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 12.20% | +5.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 13.52% | +6.28% |
NIE vs. TCBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NIE has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than TCBIX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
NIE vs. TCBIX - Dividend Comparison
NIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.04%, more than TCBIX's 8.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIE Virtus Equity & Convertible Income Fund | 10.04% | 10.14% | 8.11% | 9.56% | 21.81% | 10.86% | 5.37% | 6.71% | 8.20% | 7.19% | 8.25% | 8.46% |
TCBIX The Covered Bridge Fund | 8.33% | 8.24% | 7.47% | 7.34% | 8.09% | 6.00% | 4.70% | 6.77% | 11.55% | 7.32% | 7.32% | 5.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NIE and TCBIX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NIE has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to TCBIX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIE dropped -57.90% vs TCBIX's -28.94%.
TCBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NIE and TCBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer