PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NICK.L vs. ZINC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NICK.L vs. ZINC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Nickel (NICK.L) and WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NICK.L achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly lower than ZINC.L's 15.82% return. Over the past 10 years, NICK.L has underperformed ZINC.L with an annualized return of 6.28%, while ZINC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.37% annualized return.


NICK.L

1D
-1.03%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
10.65%
6M
23.90%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
-5.71%
5Y*
-0.66%
10Y*
6.28%

ZINC.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
6.40%
YTD
15.82%
6M
17.29%
1Y
38.82%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
7.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NICK.L vs. ZINC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NICK.L
WisdomTree Nickel
10.65%6.27%-8.39%-46.66%46.43%23.82%14.32%32.82%-14.50%18.74%
ZINC.L
WisdomTree Zinc
15.82%6.70%13.11%-9.01%-11.08%26.65%15.73%-0.07%-22.41%27.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NICK.L and ZINC.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2006

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NICK.L vs. ZINC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NICK.L
NICK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
NICK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NICK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NICK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NICK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NICK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ZINC.L
ZINC.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ZINC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZINC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZINC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ZINC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZINC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NICK.L vs. ZINC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Nickel (NICK.L) and WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NICK.LZINC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.34

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

3.60

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.88

13.28

-9.40

NICK.L vs. ZINC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NICK.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the ZINC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NICK.L and ZINC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NICK.LZINC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

2.12

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.23

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.31

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

-0.03

-0.05

Drawdowns

NICK.L vs. ZINC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NICK.L drawdown since its inception was -87.80%, which is greater than ZINC.L's maximum drawdown of -77.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NICK.L and ZINC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NICK.LZINC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.80%

-77.49%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.26%

-10.74%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.82%

-19.66%

-21.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.83%

-47.04%

-24.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.83%

-47.04%

-24.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.59%

-36.98%

-37.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.10%

-56.38%

-13.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

2.90%

+1.90%

Volatility

NICK.L vs. ZINC.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Nickel (NICK.L) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) at 4.90%. This indicates that NICK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZINC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NICK.LZINC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

4.90%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.98%

14.12%

+8.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.65%

18.26%

+6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.13%

25.18%

+18.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.48%

23.98%

+12.50%

NICK.L vs. ZINC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NICK.L and ZINC.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

NICK.L vs. ZINC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NICK.L nor ZINC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NICK.L and ZINC.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NICK.L and ZINC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

NICK.L tracks Bloomberg Nickel, while ZINC.L tracks Bloomberg Zinc.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NICK.L and ZINC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer