PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NI vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NI vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NiSource Inc. (NI) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NI achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 20.73% return.


NI

1D
-0.72%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
10.46%
6M
10.15%
1Y
18.56%
3Y*
23.25%
5Y*
16.06%
10Y*
9.85%

QQQM

1D
-0.54%
1M
8.67%
YTD
20.73%
6M
19.22%
1Y
40.83%
3Y*
28.64%
5Y*
17.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NI vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NI
NiSource Inc.
10.46%16.81%43.48%0.48%2.67%24.75%0.17%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
20.73%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between NI and QQQM is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NI vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NI
NI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NI vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NiSource Inc. (NI) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NIQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.44

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

3.43

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.04

13.15

-7.11

NI vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NI Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NI and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NIQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.58

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.81

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.84

-0.36

Drawdowns

NI vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NI drawdown since its inception was -65.73%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NI and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.73%

-35.04%

-30.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-11.96%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.73%

-22.70%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.76%

-35.04%

+10.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.70%

-0.75%

-4.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.92%

-8.24%

-4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

3.11%

-0.03%

Volatility

NI vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

NiSource Inc. (NI) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.51%. This indicates that NI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

4.51%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

12.06%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.76%

15.91%

+1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.02%

22.23%

-2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.15%

22.11%

+1.04%

Dividends

NI vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

NI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than QQQM's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NI
NiSource Inc.
2.55%2.68%2.88%3.77%3.43%3.19%3.66%2.87%3.08%2.73%2.89%145.67%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.42%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NI and QQQM have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NI has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to QQQM (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NI dropped -65.73% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NI and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer