PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHYDY vs. AA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NHYDY vs. AA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Norsk Hydro ASA ADR (NHYDY) and Alcoa Corporation (AA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHYDY achieves a 69.18% return, which is significantly higher than AA's 47.30% return.


NHYDY

1D
0.31%
1M
11.31%
YTD
69.18%
6M
78.61%
1Y
142.54%
3Y*
31.41%
5Y*
20.58%
10Y*
17.85%

AA

1D
-3.51%
1M
23.92%
YTD
47.30%
6M
77.85%
1Y
187.73%
3Y*
33.73%
5Y*
16.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHYDY vs. AA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHYDY
Norsk Hydro ASA ADR
69.18%47.30%-14.94%-4.18%5.95%76.35%34.91%-15.68%-38.01%65.31%
AA
Alcoa Corporation
47.30%42.46%12.43%-24.33%-23.12%159.05%7.16%-19.07%-50.66%91.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NHYDY and AA is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016

0.57

The correlation between NHYDY and AA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NHYDY:

$25.13B

AA:

$20.57B

EPS

NHYDY:

$3.10

AA:

$3.92

PE Ratio

NHYDY:

4.13

AA:

19.91

PEG Ratio

NHYDY:

0.17

AA:

0.05

PS Ratio

NHYDY:

0.13

AA:

1.61

PB Ratio

NHYDY:

0.25

AA:

3.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

NHYDY:

$201.27B

AA:

$12.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NHYDY:

$60.54B

AA:

$948.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

NHYDY:

$24.40B

AA:

$1.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHYDY vs. AA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHYDY
NHYDY Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
NHYDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHYDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHYDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NHYDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHYDY Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

AA
AA Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AA Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHYDY vs. AA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Norsk Hydro ASA ADR (NHYDY) and Alcoa Corporation (AA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NHYDYAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.45

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.41

11.96

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

46.47

29.59

+16.88

NHYDY vs. AA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHYDY Sharpe Ratio is 4.58, which is comparable to the AA Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHYDY and AA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NHYDYAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.58

3.59

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.29

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.26

+0.22

Drawdowns

NHYDY vs. AA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHYDY drawdown since its inception was -73.90%, smaller than the maximum AA drawdown of -90.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYDY and AA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHYDYAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.90%

-90.90%

+17.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-15.80%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.35%

-52.25%

+22.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.67%

-75.46%

+28.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-14.08%

+12.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.26%

-46.20%

+20.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

6.37%

-3.29%

Volatility

NHYDY vs. AA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Norsk Hydro ASA ADR (NHYDY) is 10.04%, while Alcoa Corporation (AA) has a volatility of 15.87%. This indicates that NHYDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHYDYAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.04%

15.87%

-5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.26%

39.07%

-12.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.35%

52.65%

-21.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.21%

55.98%

-16.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.35%

55.55%

-16.20%

Dividends

NHYDY vs. AA - Dividend Comparison

NHYDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than AA's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AA
Alcoa Corporation
0.51%0.75%1.06%1.18%0.88%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.32%
NHYDY
Norsk Hydro ASA ADR
2.48%2.65%4.30%8.10%9.59%1.86%5.44%3.92%4.96%1.91%2.60%

Financials

NHYDY vs. AA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Norsk Hydro ASA ADR and Alcoa Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
50.39B
3.19B
(NHYDY) Total Revenue
(AA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NHYDY vs. AA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Norsk Hydro ASA ADR and Alcoa Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
31.9%
0
Portfolio components
NHYDY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norsk Hydro ASA ADR reported a gross profit of 16.09B and revenue of 50.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.9%.

AA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NHYDY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norsk Hydro ASA ADR reported an operating income of 9.11B and revenue of 50.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

AA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

NHYDY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norsk Hydro ASA ADR reported a net income of 4.24B and revenue of 50.39B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.

AA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a net income of 425.00M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NHYDY and AA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AA has higher volatility (15.87%) compared to NHYDY (10.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHYDY dropped -73.90% vs AA's -90.90%.

NHYDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.58 vs 3.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHYDY and AA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer