NHYB vs. SRLN
NHYB (Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and SRLN (State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NHYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while SRLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by State Street. NHYB is passively managed, while SRLN is actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NHYB charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SRLN.
Performance
NHYB vs. SRLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHYB achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than SRLN's 0.23% return.
NHYB
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRLN
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- 4.54%
NHYB vs. SRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.99% | 1.24% |
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 0.23% | 1.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between NHYB and SRLN is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NHYB vs. SRLN — Risk / Return Rank
NHYB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SRLN
NHYB vs. SRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB) and State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NHYB | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.84 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NHYB vs. SRLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHYB drawdown since its inception was -2.40%, smaller than the maximum SRLN drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYB and SRLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHYB | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -22.29% | +19.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.57% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -1.09% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility
NHYB vs. SRLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NHYB | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61% | 2.91% | +0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.61% | 3.91% | -0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.61% | 6.06% | -2.45% |
NHYB vs. SRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHYB has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SRLN's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
NHYB vs. SRLN - Dividend Comparison
NHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than SRLN's 7.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 4.24% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 7.53% | 7.67% | 8.58% | 8.44% | 5.72% | 4.45% | 4.91% | 5.39% | 4.98% | 4.01% | 3.94% | 4.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NHYB and SRLN have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NHYB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.
SRLN has the higher dividend yield at 7.53%, compared with 4.24% for NHYB.
NHYB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SRLN is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NHYB and 0.70% for SRLN.
Find the right allocation for NHYB and SRLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer