PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHTC vs. GLAD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NHTC vs. GLAD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) and Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHTC achieves a -11.42% return, which is significantly lower than GLAD's -1.91% return. Over the past 10 years, NHTC has underperformed GLAD with an annualized return of -12.59%, while GLAD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.75% annualized return.


NHTC

1D
-1.90%
1M
-15.96%
YTD
-11.42%
6M
-6.26%
1Y
-38.97%
3Y*
-9.90%
5Y*
-7.90%
10Y*
-12.59%

GLAD

1D
-0.41%
1M
1.90%
YTD
-1.91%
6M
-2.47%
1Y
-19.16%
3Y*
11.05%
5Y*
5.33%
10Y*
12.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHTC vs. GLAD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
-11.42%-20.49%-11.51%96.17%-42.12%50.40%6.62%-68.83%37.37%-35.39%
GLAD
Gladstone Capital Corporation
-1.91%-21.14%46.99%22.71%-10.43%40.50%-0.69%48.58%-13.07%7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NHTC and GLAD is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2002

0.08

The correlation between NHTC and GLAD shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (3 years) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NHTC:

$26.17M

GLAD:

$552.26M

EPS

NHTC:

-$0.10

GLAD:

$1.09

PS Ratio

NHTC:

0.75

GLAD:

7.52

PB Ratio

NHTC:

1.59

GLAD:

1.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

NHTC:

$38.25M

GLAD:

$66.59M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NHTC:

$28.25M

GLAD:

$28.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

NHTC:

-$1.45M

GLAD:

$27.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHTC vs. GLAD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHTC
NHTC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NHTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHTC Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
NHTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHTC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

GLAD
GLAD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GLAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAD Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAD Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHTC vs. GLAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) and Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NHTCGLADDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.58

-0.77

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.54

-0.94

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.88

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-0.51

-0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.60

-0.80

-0.80

NHTC vs. GLAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is comparable to the GLAD Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHTC and GLAD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NHTCGLADDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

-0.77

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.23

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.25

0.43

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.18

-0.30

Drawdowns

NHTC vs. GLAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHTC drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than GLAD's maximum drawdown of -74.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHTC and GLAD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHTCGLADDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-74.87%

-25.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.27%

-39.22%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.85%

-39.59%

-19.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.85%

-39.59%

-19.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.71%

-58.37%

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.97%

-27.77%

-72.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-95.82%

-18.70%

-77.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.40%

25.08%

-1.68%

Volatility

NHTC vs. GLAD - Volatility Comparison

Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) has a higher volatility of 12.18% compared to Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD) at 6.62%. This indicates that NHTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHTCGLADDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.18%

6.62%

+5.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.52%

18.49%

+17.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.38%

25.13%

+42.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.34%

23.62%

+22.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.83%

30.01%

+20.82%

Dividends

NHTC vs. GLAD - Dividend Comparison

NHTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.26%, more than GLAD's 10.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLAD
Gladstone Capital Corporation
10.07%9.85%8.37%9.16%8.42%6.73%8.97%8.46%11.51%9.12%8.95%11.49%
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
23.26%25.89%17.32%13.65%23.32%11.83%16.06%10.41%13.63%9.02%2.45%0.42%

Financials

NHTC vs. GLAD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Natural Health Trends Corp. and Gladstone Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M20222023202420252026
9.21M
21.49M
(NHTC) Total Revenue
(GLAD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NHTC vs. GLAD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Natural Health Trends Corp. and Gladstone Capital Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
75.0%
0
Portfolio components
NHTC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Health Trends Corp. reported a gross profit of 6.90M and revenue of 9.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.0%.

GLAD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 21.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NHTC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Health Trends Corp. reported an operating income of -474.00K and revenue of 9.21M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.2%.

GLAD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 21.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

NHTC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Health Trends Corp. reported a net income of -154.00K and revenue of 9.21M, resulting in a net margin of -1.7%.

GLAD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Capital Corporation reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 21.49M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NHTC and GLAD have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NHTC has higher volatility (12.18%) compared to GLAD (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHTC dropped -100.00% vs GLAD's -74.87%.

NHTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHTC and GLAD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer