PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHMAX vs. NZF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NHMAX vs. NZF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHMAX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly higher than NZF's 1.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NHMAX having a 3.04% annualized return and NZF not far ahead at 3.16%.


NHMAX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.55%
6M
1.15%
YTD
1.76%
1Y
8.76%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
3.04%
ALL TIME*
4.54%

NZF

1D
-0.73%
1M
-2.79%
6M
1.93%
YTD
1.35%
1Y
10.90%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
-1.05%
10Y*
3.16%
ALL TIME*
5.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$6.09M$6.45M$6.65M

NHMAX vs. NZF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
1.76%2.51%5.36%6.96%-15.14%9.71%3.03%11.96%1.79%11.90%
NZF
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
1.35%11.78%10.09%2.49%-25.53%11.19%3.58%28.33%-6.79%14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between NHMAX and NZF is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2001

0.31

The correlation between NHMAX and NZF shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.48 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHMAX vs. NZF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NHMAX
NHMAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NHMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NHMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NZF
NZF Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
NZF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZF Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NZF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NHMAX vs. NZF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NHMAXNZFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.22

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

1.55

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.02

6.35

+3.67

NHMAX vs. NZF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the NZF Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHMAX and NZF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NHMAX vs. NZF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHMAX drawdown since its inception was -45.60%, smaller than the maximum NZF drawdown of -48.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHMAX and NZF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHMAXNZFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.60%

-48.55%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.58%

-8.11%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.93%

-13.54%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

-37.42%

+15.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.22%

-37.42%

+15.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-5.67%

+3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-7.75%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

1.97%

-0.99%

Volatility

NHMAX vs. NZF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) is 1.22%, while Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF) has a volatility of 2.12%. This indicates that NHMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NZF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHMAXNZFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

2.12%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.28%

8.08%

-4.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.29%

10.58%

-6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.85%

12.39%

-5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.70%

13.09%

-6.39%

NHMAX vs. NZF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NHMAX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NZF's 1.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

NHMAX vs. NZF - Dividend Comparison

NHMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than NZF's 7.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NHMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
5.05%5.84%5.54%7.10%5.41%4.49%4.83%4.77%5.26%5.20%5.61%5.39%
NZF
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
7.82%7.58%6.84%4.51%5.80%4.63%4.74%4.82%6.05%5.86%6.26%5.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


NHMAX and NZF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NZF has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to NHMAX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHMAX dropped -45.60% vs NZF's -48.55%.

NHMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHMAX and NZF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer