PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHMAX vs. GHYIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NHMAX vs. GHYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHMAX achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly higher than GHYIX's 2.73% return. Over the past 10 years, NHMAX has underperformed GHYIX with an annualized return of 3.34%, while GHYIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.60% annualized return.


NHMAX

1D
0.07%
1M
2.51%
YTD
3.38%
6M
4.00%
1Y
9.06%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
3.34%

GHYIX

1D
0.22%
1M
2.17%
YTD
2.73%
6M
3.37%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
3.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHMAX vs. GHYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
3.38%2.51%5.36%6.96%-15.14%9.71%3.03%11.96%1.79%11.90%
GHYIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class
2.73%3.92%5.74%7.34%-14.79%5.79%4.96%11.47%4.97%9.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NHMAX and GHYIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.71

The correlation between NHMAX and GHYIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHMAX vs. GHYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHMAX
NHMAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NHMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NHMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GHYIX
GHYIX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GHYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHMAX vs. GHYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NHMAXGHYIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.49

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.45

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

7.60

-0.01

NHMAX vs. GHYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the GHYIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHMAX and GHYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NHMAX vs. GHYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHMAX drawdown since its inception was -45.60%, which is greater than GHYIX's maximum drawdown of -35.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHMAX and GHYIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHMAXGHYIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.60%

-35.88%

-9.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.58%

-3.05%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.29%

-8.35%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

-19.82%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.22%

-19.82%

-2.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.48%

-4.60%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

0.98%

+0.22%

Volatility

NHMAX vs. GHYIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) at 0.90%. This indicates that NHMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GHYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHMAXGHYIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

0.90%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

2.47%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

3.52%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.83%

5.35%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.69%

5.39%

+1.30%

NHMAX vs. GHYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NHMAX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GHYIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

NHMAX vs. GHYIX - Dividend Comparison

NHMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than GHYIX's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHYIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class
4.62%6.12%4.38%3.56%3.04%3.06%3.44%4.03%4.12%4.36%4.81%4.88%
NHMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
5.40%5.84%5.54%7.10%5.41%4.49%4.83%4.77%5.26%5.20%5.61%5.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, NHMAX and GHYIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NHMAX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to GHYIX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHMAX dropped -45.60% vs GHYIX's -35.88%.

GHYIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHMAX and GHYIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer