PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHYIX vs. TMNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHYIX vs. TMNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) and Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHYIX achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly higher than TMNIX's 1.27% return.


GHYIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.71%
YTD
2.17%
6M
2.57%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
5.15%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
3.68%

TMNIX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.50%
1Y
5.56%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
2.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHYIX vs. TMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GHYIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class
2.17%3.92%5.74%7.34%-14.79%5.79%4.96%11.47%1.16%
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
1.27%2.56%3.92%6.85%-3.12%2.96%6.73%8.70%0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between GHYIX and TMNIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018

0.61

The correlation between GHYIX and TMNIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHYIX vs. TMNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHYIX
GHYIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GHYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TMNIX
TMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHYIX vs. TMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) and Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GHYIXTMNIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.93

2.21

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.04

3.31

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.58

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.46

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.27

6.84

+0.43

GHYIX vs. TMNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHYIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the TMNIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHYIX and TMNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GHYIXTMNIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.21

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.75

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

1.39

-0.39

Drawdowns

GHYIX vs. TMNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHYIX drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, which is greater than TMNIX's maximum drawdown of -4.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYIX and TMNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHYIXTMNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.88%

-4.63%

-31.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-2.26%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.35%

-4.61%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.82%

-4.63%

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.70%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-1.48%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.81%

+0.17%

Volatility

GHYIX vs. TMNIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) has a higher volatility of 1.29% compared to Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX) at 1.08%. This indicates that GHYIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHYIXTMNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

1.08%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

1.98%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57%

2.53%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.35%

3.04%

+2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.39%

2.69%

+2.70%

GHYIX vs. TMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHYIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than TMNIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GHYIX vs. TMNIX - Dividend Comparison

GHYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than TMNIX's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHYIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class
4.65%6.12%4.38%3.56%3.04%3.06%3.44%4.03%4.12%4.36%4.81%4.88%
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
3.13%2.79%3.31%3.40%0.36%4.39%2.36%3.69%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHYIX and TMNIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GHYIX has higher volatility (1.29%) compared to TMNIX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHYIX dropped -35.88% vs TMNIX's -4.63%.

TMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHYIX and TMNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer