PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHFIX vs. PRFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NHFIX vs. PRFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern High Yield Fixed Income Fund (NHFIX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHFIX achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than PRFRX's 1.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NHFIX having a 5.55% annualized return and PRFRX not far behind at 5.51%.


NHFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.16%
1Y
7.76%
3Y*
9.25%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
5.55%

PRFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.39%
6M
2.68%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
5.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHFIX vs. PRFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHFIX
Northern High Yield Fixed Income Fund
1.87%8.79%8.03%13.96%-13.74%5.03%6.04%16.17%-3.60%8.35%
PRFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
1.39%9.82%11.04%13.78%-1.95%4.60%1.75%8.46%-0.08%3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between NHFIX and PRFRX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2011

0.45

The correlation between NHFIX and PRFRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHFIX vs. PRFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHFIX
NHFIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NHFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NHFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

PRFRX
PRFRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PRFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHFIX vs. PRFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern High Yield Fixed Income Fund (NHFIX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NHFIXPRFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

2.31

-0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

5.54

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.88

20.99

-5.11

NHFIX vs. PRFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the PRFRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHFIX and PRFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NHFIXPRFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

3.15

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

2.45

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

1.41

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

1.43

-0.37

Drawdowns

NHFIX vs. PRFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHFIX drawdown since its inception was -27.87%, which is greater than PRFRX's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHFIX and PRFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHFIXPRFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.87%

-20.05%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.10%

-1.50%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.39%

-2.35%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.47%

-5.94%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.72%

-20.05%

-4.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-0.69%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

0.40%

+0.10%

Volatility

NHFIX vs. PRFRX - Volatility Comparison

Northern High Yield Fixed Income Fund (NHFIX) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX) at 0.61%. This indicates that NHFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHFIXPRFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

0.61%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

1.84%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.37%

2.63%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.10%

2.91%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.95%

3.92%

+2.03%

NHFIX vs. PRFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NHFIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PRFRX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NHFIX vs. PRFRX - Dividend Comparison

NHFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, less than PRFRX's 9.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NHFIX
Northern High Yield Fixed Income Fund
7.00%6.87%6.67%6.57%3.84%4.92%5.41%6.35%6.85%6.66%5.57%6.19%
PRFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
9.21%9.99%10.20%9.57%4.03%3.86%4.00%4.84%4.87%4.04%4.07%4.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


NHFIX and PRFRX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NHFIX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to PRFRX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHFIX dropped -27.87% vs PRFRX's -20.05%.

PRFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHFIX and PRFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer