PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NGUAX vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NGUAX vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NGUAX achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.45% return. Over the past 10 years, NGUAX has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 15.98%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.77% annualized return.


NGUAX

1D
-0.91%
1M
3.18%
YTD
6.03%
6M
5.21%
1Y
17.45%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
15.98%

SPMO

1D
-1.46%
1M
10.84%
YTD
28.45%
6M
27.50%
1Y
43.92%
3Y*
42.27%
5Y*
23.92%
10Y*
20.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NGUAX vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NGUAX
Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund
6.03%14.38%23.80%35.98%-24.47%27.43%34.56%36.69%-7.16%25.28%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.45%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between NGUAX and SPMO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.76

The correlation between NGUAX and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NGUAX vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NGUAX
NGUAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NGUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NGUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NGUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NGUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
NGUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NGUAX vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NGUAXSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.44

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

3.47

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

13.52

-9.08

NGUAX vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NGUAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NGUAX and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NGUAXSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.49

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

1.25

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

1.03

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

1.00

-0.96

Drawdowns

NGUAX vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NGUAX drawdown since its inception was -78.07%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGUAX and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NGUAXSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.07%

-30.95%

-47.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.16%

-12.70%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.89%

-20.13%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.43%

-22.74%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.99%

-30.95%

-1.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-1.46%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.87%

-4.60%

-27.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

3.26%

+0.84%

Volatility

NGUAX vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX) is 3.16%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that NGUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NGUAXSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

7.39%

-4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

14.49%

-4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.43%

17.70%

-4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

19.30%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

20.31%

-2.05%

NGUAX vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NGUAX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

NGUAX vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

NGUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.72%, more than SPMO's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NGUAX
Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund
11.72%12.43%6.01%4.30%6.62%10.92%7.60%6.21%11.21%6.87%13.11%12.82%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.66%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


NGUAX and SPMO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to NGUAX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NGUAX dropped -78.07% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NGUAX and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer